Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 677 So. 2d 692.

27 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. D'Mycal Lmontay Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 6/26/96), this court stated: (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Vernon Holden A/K/A Vernon Demtrius Holden, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 6/26/96), this court, recognized the failure to 7 follow the mandatory delays for sentencing provided in La.Code Crim.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jerome Cochran A/K/A Michael Jerome Cochran, Jr. A/K/A Michael Cochran La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 6/26/96), this court, recognized the failure to follow the mandatory delays for sentencing provided in La.Code Crim.
State of Louisiana v. Trivual A. Charles -Aka- Trivual Batiste -Aka- Trivual Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 6/26/96), this court, recognized the failure to follow the mandatory delays for sentencing provided in La.Code Crim.
State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 6/26/96), in support of his argument for remand.
State v. Jinks 267 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 6/26/96) ] the sentence is null and does not support incarceration.
State v. Charles 270 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 6/26/96) , , this court, relying on State v. Augustine , recognized the failure to follow the mandatory delays for sentencing provided in La.Code Crim.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Bell, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Bell 140 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Donald Runnels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Williams, 96-37 (La.App 3 Cir. 6/26/96)
State v. Runnels 101 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Williams, 96-37 (La.App 3 Cir. 6/26/96), .
State of Louisiana v. Darrell W. Westmoreland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Westmoreland 63 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Stipe 59 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“[I]t is well settled that a sentence must be individualized as to each defendant....” (La.App.
State v. Thomas 48 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“[I]t is well settled that a sentence must be individualized as to each defendant....” “ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. S.J.I. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 6/26/96), this court explained in pertinent part: (La.App.
State v. Harris 911 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Dixon 852 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Randle 827 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Willis 823 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Marcotte 817 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. King 757 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Dronet 721 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Lofton 701 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997