Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCarroll v. McCarroll, 701 So. 2d 1280.
-
Noel W. Yates v. Lisa J. Yates
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
10/21/97), as cited by the second circuit in Mason v. Mason, 40,804, p. 5 (La.App.
-
Tammie Britt v. Carl Britt
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96- 2700 (La.10/21/97), (La.App.
-
Terence St. Germain v. Lesley Simmons St. Germain
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
See McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), Juneau v. Laborde, 228 La.
-
Charlene Bruser Cambre v. Anton Cambre
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
10/21/97), 1 Mr. Cambre argues that McCarroll, in applying La.
- The Succession of Linda Hack Pellette La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
-
Tasha Pulley Anthony v. Jared David Anthony, Sr
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
10/ 21/ 97), which required a contemporaneous award of use and rent.
-
Hoskins v. State Through Division of Administration , Office of Community Development
273 So. 3d 323
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/21/97), , 1286 ; Martin Exploration Company v. Amoco Production Company , 93-0349 (La.
-
LeBlanc v. Elam
266 So. 3d 935
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/21/97), , 1284-85 (applying Article 814 to find that an extrajudicial partition of community property was lesionary).
- Lockwood v. Lockwood 256 So. 3d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Carver v. Carver
243 So. 3d 1066
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/21/1997), , 1288 (emphasis in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: La.R.S.
-
Ricky A. Carver v. Pamela Ann Sumler Carver
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10/21/1997), (emphasis in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: La.R.S.
-
Real Estate De Louisiane, Inc. v. allen/laborde
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
10/21/97), see also LeBlanc v. Romero, 00-1233 (La.App.
- Sork v. Sork 242 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Webb v. Webb 238 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
Hansen v. River Cities Disposal Co.
245 So. 3d 213
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
10/21/97), ; Driver Pipeline Co. v. Cadeville Gas Storage LLC , 49,375 (La.
-
Bulloch v. Bulloch
214 So. 3d 930
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
10/21/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that rental payments may not be retroactively assessed under La.
-
Timothy M. Van Mol, Et Ux. v. Ken Beasley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
La.Civ.Code art. 1848; McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97)
-
Van Mol v. Beasley
184 So. 3d 280
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
La.Civ.Code art. 1848; McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Hansen v. River Cities Disposal Co.
174 So. 3d 1203
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
- Kirby A. Roy, III, Et Ux. v. Nelson Bordelon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
-
Melvin Anthony Tassin v. Constance Mikita Tassin
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
10/21/97), for the proposition that La.R.S.
-
Tassin v. Tassin
161 So. 3d 818
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Specifically, he cites McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , for the proposition that La.R.S.
- Jonathan Kendrick v. Ruthie Paul Kendrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
Kendrick v. Kendrick
136 So. 3d 958
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The seminal case addressing whether a former spouse may be assessed rent retroactively for occupying the former family home pending partition of the community property is McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Jeromie Chad Smith v. Western World Insurance Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
La.Civ.Code art. 1848; McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97)
-
Smith v. Western World Insurance Co.
134 So. 3d 1198
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
La.Civ.Code art. 1848; McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Dione W. David v. Richard G. David
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
10/21/97), and Moore v. Moore, 05-290 (La.App.
-
David v. David
117 So. 3d 148
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
He cites McCarroll v. 21McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , and Moore v. Moore, 05-290 (La.App.
-
Mary Helen Levine v. Larry James Johnson, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
10/21/97), the supreme court stated: “[W]e hold that rental payments may not be retroactively assessed under La.R.S.
-
English v. English
105 So. 3d 994
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), ; Taylor v. Taylor, 38,959 (La.App.2d Cir.11/1/00), ; (La.App.
-
Simmons v. Simmons
109 So. 3d 10
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Gallaty v. Gallaty
101 So. 3d 501
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
9:374(C), there must be an agreement between the spouses or a court order for rent contemporaneous with the award of occupancy.” McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Debra D. Ashmore v. Merrell D. Ashmore
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2 that the 1995 limitation on reconciliation set forth in La.RS.
-
Ashmore v. Ashmore
80 So. 3d 693
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1 Cir. 6/28/96), , rev’d on other grounds, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , that the 1995 limitation on reconciliation set forth in La.R.S.
-
Brandner v. Staf-Rath, L.L.C.
64 So. 3d 812
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), (citation omitted).
-
Nesbitt v. Nesbitt
15 So. 3d 1229
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See McCarroll v. McCarroll, 1996-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Bourgeois v. Bourgeois
16 So. 3d 431
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The child support credit for mortgage payments constitutes the retroactive grant of a rental credit which was not requested, contrary to McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Miller v. Miller
1 So. 3d 815
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), ; Holmes v. Willett, 00-007914 (La.App.
-
Von Drake v. Rogers
996 So. 2d 608
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Bruscato v. Oswalt
975 So. 2d 120
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See also McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Martello v. Martello
960 So. 2d 186
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Saacks v. Saacks
942 So. 2d 1130
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Mason v. Mason
927 So. 2d 1235
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
In McCarroll v. McCarroll, 1996-2700 (La.10/21/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that rental payments may not be retroactively assessed under La.
- Tammy Brafa D/B/A Magnolia Group Realty v. Charles J. Christ, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Donna C. Moore v. Charles L. Moore, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/21/97), (holding that retroactive assessment of rent to a spouse is inappropriate absent an agreement by the spouses or a court order).
-
Moore v. Moore
917 So. 2d 1126
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
9:374(C) and the rule established in McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), (holding that retroactive assessment of rent to a spouse is inappropriate absent an agreement by the spouses or a court order).
-
Brafa v. Christ
915 So. 2d 957
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
La.Civ.Code art. 1848; McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Gill v. Gill
895 So. 2d 807
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), ; La.
-
Sequeira v. Sequeira
888 So. 2d 1097
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[6] McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , citing Juneau v. Laborde, 228 La.
- Debra Parish Philmon v. Jake C. Philmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004