DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCarroll v. McCarroll, 701 So. 2d 1280.

82 citing documents.

  • Philmon v. Philmon 886 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Schuler v. Schuler 876 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Diane M. Sheridon, Born Richard v. Jonathan Sheridon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    10/21/97), the supreme court resolved the conflicts among the courts of appeal in interpreting this provision.
  • Sheridon v. Sheridon 867 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , the supreme court resolved the conflicts among the courts of appeal in interpreting this provision.
  • Wallace v. First Assur. Life of America 862 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Ainsworth v. Ainsworth 860 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , on remand 99-0046 (La.App.
  • Gravois v. Gravois 860 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Day v. Day 858 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , parol evidence was allowed to clarify an ambiguity in an authentic act, namely, whether retirement benefits were contemplated by the parties when they used the term, "movable property" in that act.
  • Pelafigue v. Sudduth 820 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    However, as the supreme court recognized in McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97); , an award of rent under La.R.S.
  • Gautney v. Gautney 814 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Hoover v. Hoover 798 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700, p. 10 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Holliday v. Holliday 795 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Similarly, in McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , parol evidence was allowed to clarify an ambiguity in an authentic act, namely, whether retirement benefits were contemplated by the parties when they used the term, "movable property" in that act.
  • Cahill v. Kerins 784 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    See McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), ; Juneau v. Laborde, 228 La.
  • LeBlanc v. Romero 783 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700, pp. 12-13 (La.10/21/97), (footnote omitted)(emphasis ours).
  • Holmes v. Willett 773 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Taylor v. Taylor 772 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), ; (La.App.
  • Munson v. Munson 772 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    [2] 96-2700 (La.10/21/97); .
  • Norman v. Norman 775 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), at 18, .
  • Richard v. Richard 762 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Baechle v. Baechle 762 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    As set forth in McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700, p. 10 (La.10/21/97), .
  • McCarroll v. McCarroll 767 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), .
  • Ball v. Ball 757 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Citing McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , the trial court ruled on Karen's reimbursement claim as follows: "The Court finds that, just as Mr. Ball [because of McCarroll ] was denied rental payments from Mr. and Mrs. Franklin, Mr. Franklin and Mrs. Franklin should be denied reimbursement for one-half the mortgage payments.
  • Otterstatter v. Otterstatter 758 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97); .
  • Lupberger v. Lupberger 738 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Nor do I agree that McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , would preclude a party from seeking a reconsideration or modification of a previous ruling awarding use and occupancy, or, alternatively, the payment of rent prospectively under the appropriate circumstances.
  • Cooper v. Cooper 737 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    9:374(B) and (C) and the recent ruling of our supreme court in McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , a former spouse may continue to reside in the co-owned family home without the payment of rent for the use of the home unless rent is otherwise agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the court.
  • Kline v. Kline 741 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Dora attacks the use of this article and the application of McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97); , to the present matter as an unconstitutional abrogation of vested rights.
  • Stewart v. Stewart 728 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    However, Preis, according to Ms. Stewart has been modified by McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97); .
  • McKinley v. Scott 721 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97); .
  • Young v. Smith 715 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700 (La.10/21/97), , recognized that there had been a split in the circuits regarding whether an assessment of rent may be made retroactively for a spouse's occupation of the family home pending partition of the community property.
  • Taylor v. Burton 708 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-C-2700, p. 12 (La.10/21/97); .
  • Cryer v. Cryer 706 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Recently, in McCarroll v. McCarroll, 96-2700, p. 18 (La.10/21/97); , the Supreme Court resolved a split among the circuits on this issue.
  • Ecroyd v. Ecroyd 706 So. 2d 440 La. 1997