Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stroik v. Ponseti, 699 So. 2d 1072.

52 citing documents.

Mechelle Rugg v. Horseshoe Entertainment La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Joseph Larocca and Larocca Auto Sales, Inc. Versus Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Weaver v. City of Shreveport 261 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
9/9/97), ; Courville on Behalf of Vincent v. City of Lake Charles , 98-73 (La.
Dominique Floyd v. City of Carenco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Floyd v. City of Carencro 149 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Jurnell Smith v. Bobby Guidroz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97)
Smith v. Guidroz 125 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Manis ex rel. Plaisance v. Zemlik 96 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 220 and the factors enumerated in Stroik [v. Ponseti], supra [96-2897 (La.9/9/97), ], we will first review the reasonableness of Officer Sotak’s manner of detention of Hall by ordering her to the ground.
Henry Harvey, Et Ux. v. City of Eunice Police Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Harvey v. City of Eunice Police Department 62 So. 3d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Hopkins v. Nola 58 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), (emphasis in original).
Wimberly v. Giglio 57 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Id.; Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Hall v. City of Shreveport 36 So. 3d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Robertson v. Hessler 13 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), fn.
Wilson v. Town of Mamou 972 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), , citing Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
Woodrow Wilson, Jr. v. Town of Mamou La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
9/9/97), citing Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
Brooks v. City of Jennings 944 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
See Stroik [ v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97)], ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94)
Jenkins v. Fanguy 946 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See, e.g.: Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94), ; Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Carpenter v. STATE, DEP. OF HEALTH AND HOS. 944 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Stroik v. Ponseti, 97-2897, p. 11 (La.9/9/97), (citing New Orleans & Ne.
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Benjamin v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans 893 So. 2d 1 La. 2004
Lacey v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Crutchfield v. Landry 870 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.09/09/97), .
Lagnion v. State 858 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
rt recognized that exceptions to the federal doctrine of res judicata exist where “there is an express reservation of claims, when the defendant acquiesces in such a reservation, or when the court in the first action has expressly reserved the plaintiffs right to maintain the second action.” Subsequently, the supreme court reaffirmed this position in Stroik v. Ponsetti 96-2897, p. 6, (La.9/9/97), , stating, “For the purpose of res judicata, when the court in the first action has expressly reserv
Wood v. Becnel 840 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See also Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), (quoting the language in Lacey but finding that the circumstantial evidence before it went against the clear weight of direct evidence).
Colgate v. Mughal Bros., Inc. 836 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.09/09/97), .
McGuire v. New Orleans City Park Imp. Ass'n 835 So. 2d 416 La. 2003
Co., 98-2208 (La.1999); ; Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97); ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94); ; Berry v. State Through Dep't of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748 (La.5/23/94)
Ashmore v. Hilton 834 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Lycon, Inc. v. Weatherford Artificial Lift Systems 827 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
me court recognized that exceptions to the common law theory of res judicata exist, “such as when there is an express reservation of claims, when the defendant acquiesces in such a reservation, or when the court in the first action has expressly reserved the plaintiffs right to maintain the second action.” Additionally, there is the supreme court opinion in Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), , a negligence case against a police officer for the wounding of a hostage.
Armand v. State Department of Health & Human Resources 822 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897, p. 6 (La.9/9/97), .
Seal v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 816 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97) .
Hardy v. Foti 812 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Stroik v. Ponseti 96-2897, pp. 6-7 (La.9/9/97), .
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. McCadney 806 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
NOTES [1] Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), ; Arbon v. Charbonnet, 99-852 (La.
Glover v. City of New Orleans ex rel. New Orleans Police Department 803 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Brooks v. Maggio 793 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Sarpy Properties, Inc. v. Diamond Shoe Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 761 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897, at p. 11 (La.9/9/97), (emphasis supplied).
Arbon v. Charbonnet 761 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Joseph v. Dickerson 754 So. 2d 912 La. 2000
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897, pp. 6-7 (La.9/9/97), .
McDaniel v. Green 755 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), , (La.
Williams v. Patco Assurance Co. 750 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Stroik v. Ponseti 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Latiolais v. Guillory 747 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97); , citing Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol.
McNamara v. American Liberty Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897, p. 10 (La.9/9/97); .
Hardy v. Bowie 744 So. 2d 606 La. 1999
See Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94), ; Berry v. State Through Dept. Of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748 (La.5/23/94)
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97); ; Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94); ; Berry v. State Through Dep't of Health and Human Resources, 93-2748 (La.5/23/94)
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
See Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97); .
Ross v. Property Plus, Inc. 738 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Swan v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 745 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97), .
Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Daigrepont v. AAA Transp. Co. 736 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897 (La.9/9/97); .
Shepard v. Bradford 721 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Stroik v. Ponseti, 96-2897, p. 6 (La.9/9/97); .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by