Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Barnard v. Barnard, 675 So. 2d 734.

37 citing documents.

Wayne McKowen, LLC d/b/a Revive Softwash and Wayne McKowen v. Frank Winston Crum Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
6/24/96), ( holding the parties should not be penalized for a procedural violation by the trial court).
Sarah Salley v. R B Laws Builders, LLC, Dana Baumer Wife of/and Rene Baumer, Abc Insurance Company, and … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Kimberly Uddo v. Marlin Gusman, Former Sheriff of Orleans Parish La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Jessica Mae Craft Boyer v. Jim Wayne Boyer La. 2024
Perry Emery v. Eunice Ben, Derek Russ, Ernest Jones, and Aca Realty, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
6/24/96), and Cutcher-Tufts Corp. v. Coleman, 15-0340 (La.
Richard Bray Williams and Jamie Ann Williams v. Bryan Building and Design, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Tower Credit, Inc. v. Bradley 194 So. 3d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1 Cir. 1/16/14) , ; see also Barnard v. Barnard) 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), (per curiam).
Crutcher-Tufts Corp. v. Coleman 170 So. 3d 972 La. 2015
See Barnard, v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
State v. Scott 123 So. 3d 160 La. 2013
See, e.g. State v. Goppelt, 08-0576, p. 2 (La.10/31/08), (Rule 4-3 “should be sparingly applied in cases in which a defendant does not unreasonably delay in asserting her constitutional and statutory right to seek supervisory review in the court of appeal of proceedings that have concluded in conviction and sentence”); see also Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859, p. 1 (La.6/24/96), (the trial court’s fixing of return date more 30 days from the date of its adverse judg *161 ment was not a basis for refu
Morvant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 38 So. 3d 360 La. 2010
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Morvant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 38 So. 3d 360 La. 2010
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Stamps v. Canal Indemnity Insurance 35 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
State v. Goppelt 993 So. 2d 1188 La. 2008
Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859, p. 1 (La.6/24/96), (although trial court set a return date more than 30 days from the date of its ruling, the trial court "had authority under Rule 4-3 to extend the deadline ...
Crummey v. Morgan 965 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
1st Cir.12/22/05), , 1135 n. 5, writ denied, 06-0198 (La.4/24/06), (citing Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), ).
Clark v. Matthews 948 So. 2d 186 La. 2007
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Knapper v. Hibernia National Bank 930 So. 2d 961 La. 2006
Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Gibbs v. Delatte 927 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Lanclos v. Lamb 876 So. 2d 789 La. 2004
See Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), ; Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Chailland, Inc. v. Chaisson 869 So. 2d 803 La. 2004
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Hibernia National Bank v. Carey 857 So. 2d 465 La. 2003
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Jones v. Livingston Parish Sheriff 836 So. 2d 104 La. 2003
See Kosmitis v. Bailey, 96-1573 (La.10/4/96), ; Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Sizeler Hammond Square Ltd. Partnership v. City of Hammond 827 So. 2d 410 La. 2002
Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Thompson v. Yager 816 So. 2d 294 La. 2002
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Leger v. Kent 810 So. 2d 1163 La. 2002
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Lafferty v. Allstate Insurance Co. 806 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Applicant asserts that although it may be “unusual” for the date to be extended upon the request of a court reporter, “HMA | improperly followed the order of the trial court by filing its writ on February 4, 2002.” In this respect, applicant cites Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), , in which the supreme court held that an appellate court should not penalize a party that files an application for supervisory writs more than 30 days after the ruling at issue, but within the delays set by th
State v. Khomais 793 So. 2d 206 La. 2001
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), (“[S]ince it was the trial court who violated [Uniform Court of Appeal] Rule 4-3 and since relator filed his application within the time limit authorized in the *207 order of the trial court, refusing to consider the application.”).
Carter v. Rhea 785 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859, p. 2 (La.6/24/96), .
Baker v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 772 So. 2d 113 La. 2000
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Rainey v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 766 So. 2d 1264 La. 2000
Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Rebouche v. Harvey 751 So. 2d 242 La. 1999
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/94), .
Kitchen v. Franklin 750 So. 2d 173 La. 1999
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
Ansalve v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 724 So. 2d 758 La. 1998
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
State v. Carter 703 So. 2d 1282 La. 1997
State ex rel. Used Motor Vehicles & Parts Commission v. Alexander 691 So. 2d 71 La. 1997
See Barnard v. Barnard, 96-0859 (La.6/24/96), .
State v. Cella 688 So. 2d 484 La. 1997
The matter is remanded to the court of appeal to consider the application on the merits
Deraney v. Keating 678 So. 2d 537 La. 1996
Hatter v. Baker, Gravel & Baker 675 So. 2d 1098 La. 1996

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by