Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Keith v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co., 694 So. 2d 180.

91 citing documents.

Tanya Hurel v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Company D/B/A National Indemnity Group Insurance Companies and Their Insured, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Co., 1996- 2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), ).
Cheryl Detillieu; Alfred Joseph Detillieu, III; And Michelle Detillieu Seruntine Individually and on Behalf of Alfred Detillieu, Jr., … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Douglas Bienvenu v. 1 and 2 87184 C/W John Doe v. 1 and 2 87515 La. 2024
See Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar., 96-2075, pp. [sic] (La.5/9/97), Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish Sch.
Sakura Hanna v. John Hanna La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Robinette v. Lafon Nursing Facility of the Holy Family 223 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jones v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 213 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2017
Blow v. OneBeacon America Insurance Co. 193 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), .
Robert v. Turner Specialty Services, L.L.C. 182 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 1996-2075 (La.5/9/97), , the supreme court compared La..
Kenneth Turner v. Shop Rite, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
In Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.05/09/97), the 2 supreme court held that the 1996 revision of La.C.C.
Turner v. Shop Rite, Inc. 149 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.05/09/97), , the | ¡¡supreme court held that the 1996 revision of La.C.C.
In re the Succession of Beard 147 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Civ.Code art. 6; Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), (recognizing that if a legislative enactment expresses legislative intent regarding retrospective or prospective application, no further inquiry is warranted unless the enactment impairs contractual obligations or vested rights).
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. v. Wooden 132 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), ; Rousselle, supra.
Brookewood Investments Co. v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four Chef Menteur Highway L.L.C. 116 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 96-2075, p. 5 (La.5/9/97), -83 .
Benoit v. Benoit 91 So. 3d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), .
Rochelle v. LeBlanc 65 So. 3d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Landry v. Baton Rouge Police Department 17 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
Co., 96-2075, (La.5/9/97), ; Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Mgmt.
Graves v. Riverwood Intern. Corp. 949 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983 (La.11/29/06), ; Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.05/09/97), .
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
Citing this court's decisions in Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , and Dumas v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism, 02-0563 (La.10/15/02), , the court of appeal held that LSA-C.C.
Larry Curtis v. Branton Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97)
Curtis v. Branton Industries, Inc. 944 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97); .
Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 925 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Pursuant to Louisiana Civil Code Article 2323 and the Louisiana Supreme Court's holdings in Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , 182-84 and Dumas v. State ex rel.
McGinnis v. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF LOUISIANA 914 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Gatlin v. Entergy Corp. 904 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
In Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075, pp. 5-7 (La.5/9/97), -84 , the Court stated: Comparing La.Civ.Code art. 2323, as amended, to its predecessor, it is apparent that the basic structure for comparative fault is unchanged.
Furlow v. Woodlawn Manor, Inc. 900 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Burks v. Christus Health Monroe 899 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Ginger McIntosh, Indiv. v. Wayne F. McElveen, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
05/09/97), the supreme court held that the 1996 revision of La.C.C.
McIntosh v. McElveen 893 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.05/09/97), , the supreme court held that the 1996 revision of La.C.C.
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 877 So. 2d 970 La. 2004
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Noyes 872 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
& Guar., Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Bourgeois v. Wiley 849 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Sawicki v. K/S Stavanger Prince, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.12/7/01), ; Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), .
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 844 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), , the supreme court determined that the amendment to Article 2323 is procedural and can be applied retroactively.
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
1992) (legislative enactment directed at jurisprudence apparently interpretive); Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty, 96-2075, pp. 6-7 (La.5/9/97), (legislative enactment overruling case retroactive); Reichert v. State, Dept. of Trans.
Ashmore v. Hilton 834 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
In Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.05/09/97), , the supreme court held that the 1996 revision *1136 of the La.C.C.
Scott v. American Tobacco 830 So. 2d 294 La. 2002
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075, p. 7 (La.5/9/97), .
Sage v. Radiology and Diagnostic Services 831 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), .
Louviere v. Louviere 839 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), -183 , stated: Comparing La.Civ.Code art. 2323, as amended, to its predecessor, it is apparent that the basic structure for comparative fault is unchanged.
Anderson v. May 812 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Wiley v. City of New Orleans 809 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Co., 96-2075, p. 5 (La.5/9/97), , the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated: Having reviewed this act of the First Extraordinary Session of the 1996 Legislature, it is evident that the Legislature met the concerns we expressed in Cavalier regarding how it intended that employer fault be treated in third-party tort actions.
Dumas v. State 804 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
The state also cites language from two other cases, Keith v. U.S. F. & G. Co., 96-2075 (La.05/09/97), , wherein the court stated that the 1996 amendments to articles 2323 and 2324 were procedural and that it is "the task of the factfinder to allocate shares of negligence," and Hall v. Zen-Noh Grain Corporation, 00-1376 (La.App.
Sawicki v. K/S STAVANGER PRINCE 802 So. 2d 598 La. 2001
Co., 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), ; Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish Sch.
Young v. First National Bank of Shreveport 794 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Holley v. Tate & Lyle 797 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), .
In Re Belle Co., LLC 809 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), ; Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish Sch.
Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 792 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
In support of this motion, the Defendants argue that the trial court erred in the retroactive application of La.Civ.Code art. 2323(C) relying on Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97); .
Fontenot v. Noble 786 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See, Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp. 785 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
Co., 96-2075, p. 5 (La.5/9/97), ; Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Mgmt.
Bourgeois v. AP Green Industries, Inc. 783 So. 2d 1251 La. 2001
Co., 96-2075, p. 6 (La.5/9/97), ; Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish Sch.
Overruled Castay v. ADM Growmark River Systems, Inc. 785 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Although Gauthier was overruled by the supreme court in Cavalier 2 , Cavalier was superceded by statute 3 as explained in Keith v. USF&G, 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), .
McClain v. Pinecrest Development Center 779 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
2347 , 141 L.Ed.2d 717 (1998); Keith v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 96-2075 (La.5/9/97), ; Hunter v. Town of Sibley, 32-075 (La.