Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hawkins, 688 So. 2d 473.

142 citing documents.

  • Parish of Jefferson Versus Gail Fayard & Cheryl Kirsch La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Carlos M. Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
    1/14/97), State v. Small, 10 supra; State v. Bright, 00-1255, p. 7 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Lawrence Sly La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana in the Interest of K.K. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    1/14/97), pp. 4-5, (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Marshall J. Alexander, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    1/14/97), I respectfully submit that the majority has misapplied this standard and has, in fact, substituted its credibility determinations and the weight given to certain evidence for that of the jury’s findings, which is clearly prohibited on appellate review.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    1/14/97); (Citations omitted).
  • Elray and Brenda Lege v. Union Carbide Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Johnny E. Jefferson Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
    1/14/97), State v. Lloyd, 48,914, pp. 27-28 (La.App.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Ronald St. Cyre La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    1/14/97); State v. Lampkin, 12-391 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Elvin D. Villafranca La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    1/14/97); State v. Lampkin, 12-391 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Argentina Mesa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    1/14/97); State v. Lampkin, 12-391 (La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Chaddrick Piper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State v. Quinn 275 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    1/14/97), , 480 ; State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.
  • State v. Daniels 262 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Williams 240 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1/14/97), ; State v. Robinson, 99-2236, p. 6 (La.
  • State ex rel. Huey v. State 229 So. 3d 918 La. 2017
    1/14/97), (“An incomplete record may be adequate for full appellate review”).
  • State v. Johnson 229 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1/14/97), ; State v. Nel son, 96-0883, pp. 12-13 (La.
  • State v. Caminita 203 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Gautier 197 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1/14/97), ; State v. Young, 99-1264 (La.App.
  • State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Robinson, 99-2236, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    1/14/97), the defendant alleged that his conviction should be reversed because the appellate record was incomplete as parts of the trial transcript were absent from the record.
  • State v. Thibodeaux 190 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    In State v. Hawkins, 96-766 (La.1/14/97), , the defendant alleged that his- conviction should be reversed because the appellate record was incomplete' as parts of the trial transcript were absent from the record.
  • State ex rel. Pollard v. State 180 So. 3d 1282 La. 2015
    See e.g., State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), (citing State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ).
  • State v. Thibodeaux 162 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), (citing State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ).
  • State in the Interest of J.C.R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    220, 145 L.Ed.2d 185 (1999); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97)
  • State ex rel. J.C.R. 157 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    220 , 145 L.Ed.2d 185 (1999); State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Roe 151 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Robinson, 99-2236, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State v. Porter 151 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    However, this court has held that “an incomplete record may nonetheless be adequate for appellate review” and “a defendant is not entitled to relief absent a showing of prejudice based on the missing portions of the transcripts.” Plaisance , 00-1858, pp. 17-18, 811 So.2d at 1187 (citing State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ).
  • State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Sometimes “[a]n incomplete record may be adequate for full appellate review.” State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Campbell, 06-0286, p. 99 (La.5/21/08), -73 .
  • State v. Magee 143 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Id.; See State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), -78 ; cert, denied, 506 U.S. 880 , 113 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Pete La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    220, 145 L.Ed.2d 185 (1999); State v. Hawkins[,] 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97)
  • State v. Pete 134 So. 3d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    220 , 145 L.Ed.2d 185 (1999); State v. Hawkins [,] 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Lafleur 134 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Hawkins, 96-766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Danastasio 133 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See, e.g., State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Scott 131 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Alfaro 128 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    The application of this exception is illustrated in State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 *790 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Sometimes “an incomplete record may be adequate for [full] appellate review.” State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See also State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), (which upheld defendant’s conviction despite lack of transcripts of opening statements, closing arguments and jury instructions, due to a lack of showing of prejudice by defendant).
  • State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 9/15/95) , , rehearing denied, writ granted, 96-0766 (La.9/13/96), , affirmed, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ; La.C.Cr.P.
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    Castleberry, 1998-1388 p. 29, 758 So.2d at 773; State v. Hawkins, 1996-0766 p. 8 (La.1/14/97)
  • State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Castleberry , 1998-1388 p. 29, 758 So.2d at 773 ; State v. Hawkins, 1996-0766 p. 8 (La.1/14/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Castleberry, 1998-1388 p. 29, 758 So.2d at 773; State v. Hawkins, 1996-0766 p. 8 (La.1/14/97)
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul David Heider La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    at 1438; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97)
  • State v. Heider 101 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    at 1438; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97)
  • State v. Higginbotham 122 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    See also, State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), (which upheld defendant’s conviction despite lack of transcripts of opening statements, closing arguments and jury instructions, due to a lack of showing of prejudice by defendant).