DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kalie, 699 So. 2d 879.

149 citing documents.

  • State v. Wells 45 So. 3d 577 La. 2010
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Katie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), , quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. George Earl White, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    reasonable grounds for an investigatory stop, or probable cause for an arrest, does not rest on the officer’s subjective beliefs or attitudes but turns on a completely objective evaluation of all of [the] circumstances known to the officer at the time of his challenged action.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), (emphasis in original) (citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Tate 33 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), (per curiam).
  • State v. Davis 31 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1769 , 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996) and State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), ).
  • State v. Hunt 25 So. 3d 746 La. 2009
    1581, 1585 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. LEGENDRE 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    9/19/97), -82 (per curiam).
  • State v. Lane 24 So. 3d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Katie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Pratt 16 So. 3d 1163 La. 2009
    As a general matter, “[t]he determination of reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop, or probable cause for an arrest, does not rest on the officer’s subjective beliefs or attitudes but turns on a completely objective evaluation of all of [the] circumstances known to the officer at the time of his challenged action.” State v. Katie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), (citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Robinson 11 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The Louisiana Supreme Court recited in State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), , that “the fact that the officer does not have the state of mind which is hypothecated by the reasons which provide the legal justification for the officer’s action does not invalidate the action taken so long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action,” citing Whren v. U.S., 517 U.S. 806 , 11
  • State v. Rabun 5 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Schnyder 10 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    1769 , 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996); State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Bozeman 6 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 1 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Sam 988 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Stoutes 980 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    [12] Whren, supra ; State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. James 980 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    1581 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989) (although the level of suspicion need not rise to the probable cause required for a lawful arrest, the police must articulate something more than an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (to make a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity).
  • State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Matthis 970 So. 2d 505 La. 2007
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), ("[T]he determination of reasonable grounds for an investigatory *511 stop, or probable cause for an arrest, does not rest on the officer's subjective beliefs or attitudes but turns on a completely objective evaluation of all of [the] circumstances known to the officer at the time of his challenged action.") (cit
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Gordon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Smith 947 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , per curiam.
  • State v. Kelly 946 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) (to justify investigatory stop police must articulate something more than an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), (the level of suspicion for an investigatory stop need not rise to the probable cause required for a lawful arrest); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (in making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police must have a particularized and objective basis for sus
  • State v. Leonard 945 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In making a brief investigatory stop, the police “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-418, 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Leday 930 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Slaydon 921 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), (emphasis in original) (citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Slaydon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    ourt has made clear that “the determination of reasonable grounds for an investigatory stop, or probable cause for an arrest, does not rest on the officer’s subjective beliefs or attitudes but turns on a completely objective evaluation of all of [the] circumstances known to the officer at the time of his challenged action.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), (emphasis in original) (citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dixon 911 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.09/19/97), .
  • State v. Joseph 901 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), ( per curiam ); State v. Flowers, 04-190, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Collins 890 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    The officer "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity....'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    In making a brief investigatory stop the police still "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), ( quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Tremane Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    In making a brief investigatory stop, the police “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417- 418, 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Frank 883 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In making a brief investigatory stop, the police “must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the *1113 particular person stopped of criminal activity.” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Flowers 880 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Mitchell 877 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 2/25/03) , , writ denied, 03-0948 (La.11/7/03), , citing State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , per curiam and State v. Hill, 01-1372 (La.App.
  • State v. Bradley 867 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cooley 857 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [7] State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles E Morris, Glenivan Cottle and Donell Badgett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    9/19/97), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: That Officer Brashier was conducting a drug interdiction patrol when he pulled over the Camry had no bearing on the legality of the initial stop for improper lane use.
  • State v. Morris 854 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Similarly, in State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: That Officer Brashier was conducting a drug interdiction patrol when he pulled over the Camry had no bearing on the legality of the initial stop for improper lane use.
  • State v. Temple 854 So. 2d 856 La. 2003
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular *860 person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Sims 851 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Davis 841 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [8] State v. Kalie, 96-2650, pp. 1-2 (La.9/19/97), , per curiam; State v. Hill, 01-1372, p. 5 (5 Cir. 5/15/02), .
  • State v. Adams 836 So. 2d 9 La. 2003
    690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Kali, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Singleton 828 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Lewis 828 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Katie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Washington, 2000-1936 (La.12/15/00), , citing State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Jackson 820 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Hill 821 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [6] State v. Kalie, 96-2650, pp. 1-2 (La.9/19/97), , per curiam.
  • State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Washington, 2000-1936 (La.12/15/00), , citing State v. Katie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Neuman 817 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [7] State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Romsky 817 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [8] State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .