DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kalie, 699 So. 2d 879.

149 citing documents.

  • State v. Butler 812 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [4] State v. Kalie, 96-2650, pp. 1-2 (La.9/19/97), , per curiam.
  • State v. Brown 804 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Diaz 800 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Allen 792 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Barlow 792 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97); ; ; State v. Anderson, 98-936 (La.App.
  • State v. Dumas 786 So. 2d 80 La. 2001
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), ("The circumstances `must be judged by an objective standard: would the facts available to the officer at the moment of seizure or the search warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that the action taken was appropriate?'") ( (La.
  • State v. Camese 786 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Howard 787 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Nevertheless, as the Louisiana Supreme Court wrote in State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , "the fact that the officer does not have *411 the state of mind which is hypothecated by the reasons which provide the legal justification for the officer's action does not invalidate the action taken so long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action," citing Whren v. U.S., 517 U.S. 806 , 11
  • State v. Patterson 783 So. 2d 1243 La. 2001
    See State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (police need only "some minimal level of objective justification") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Campbell 778 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Huntley, supra, 708 So.2d at 1049 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Washington 775 So. 2d 1066 La. 2000
    This combination *1067 of circumstances provided the officers with reasonable grounds to stop the defendant, see State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (police need only "some minimal level of objective justification") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) and their recovery of a rock of cocaine in the plastic bag which the defendant subsequently spat from his mouth where he had been concealing it from the officers then provided probable cause for his
  • State v. Washington 775 So. 2d 1066 La. 2000
    This combination *1067 of circumstances provided the officers with reasonable grounds to stop the defendant, see State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (police need only “some minimal level of objective justification”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) and their recovery of a rock of cocaine in the plastic bag which the defendant subsequently spat from his mouth where he had been concealing it from the officers then provided probable cause for his
  • State v. Arnold 779 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.09/19/97), .
  • State v. Hamilton 770 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In State v. Huntley, supra, 708 So.2d at 1049 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    As the Louisiana Supreme Court wrote in State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), , "the fact that the officer does not have the state of mind which is hypothecated by the reasons which provide the legal justification for the officer's action does not invalidate the action taken so long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action," citing Whren v. U.S., 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.C
  • Gibson v. State 758 So. 2d 782 La. 2000
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), (emphasis in original) ( citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Hughes 765 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Huntley, supra, 708 So.2d at 1049 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dank 764 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    The Louisiana Supreme Court stated in State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , "the fact that the officer does not have the state of mind which is hypothecated by the reasons which provide the legal justification for the officer's action does not invalidate the action taken so long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action," citing Whren v. U.S., 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.C
  • State v. Thomas 764 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97); .
  • State v. Watson 763 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Huntley, supra, 708 So.2d at 1049 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dorsey 763 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), (emphasis in original) (citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Wilson 758 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v.Huntley, 97-0865, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v.Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97); (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 762 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *51 In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Shapiro 751 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    1769 , 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996), and State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. McGee 752 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Tyler 749 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that: "the fact that the officer does not have the state of mind which is hypothecated by the reasons which provide the legal justification for the officer's action does not invalidate the action taken so long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action," citi
  • State v. Brumfield 745 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 2-3 (La.3/13/98), , citing State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), , 881 and United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Henderson 746 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Richards at 517 ; State v. Gordon, 93 1922 (La.App.
  • State v. Oliver 752 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    See also State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Harris 744 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Hill 743 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’” State v. Katie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Creecy 742 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that: "the fact that the officer does not have the state of mind which is hypothecated by the reasons which provide the legal justification for the officer's action does not invalidate the action taken so long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action," citi
  • State v. Martin 738 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Poche 733 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), ; State v. Belton, 441 So.2d at 1198 .
  • State v. Anderson 732 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Dappemont 734 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Mitchell 731 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    See also State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Drake 733 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), ; Paggett, supra .
  • State v. Landry 729 So. 2d 1019 La. 1999
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 1 (La.9/19/97), (emphasis in original) (citing Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 , 116 S.Ct.
  • State v. Franklin 719 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    1769 , 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996); State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Zapata 713 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    However, in State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recently followed the United States Supreme Court and held that the fact that an officer was conducting a drug interdiction patrol when he pulled over a car had no bearing on the legality of an initial stop for improper lane use: [T]he determination of reasonable grounds for an investigat
  • State v. Richards 713 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    See also State v. Kalie, 96-2650 (La.9/19/97), .
  • State v. Sanders 717 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 2 (La.9/19/97), ; State v. Belton, 441 So.2d at 1198 .
  • State v. Huntley 708 So. 2d 1048 La. 1998
    In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.