Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hart, 691 So. 2d 651.

47 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Delands Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3/7/97), to prove reversible error warranting reversal of both conviction and sentence, a defendant need only show that there was an erroneous denial of a challenge for cause and he exhausted all of his peremptory challenges.
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
3/7/97), –58 (approving denial of cause challenge against juror who believed that the death penalty for an intentional killing “ought to be the law,” but agreed to abide by the judge’s instructions and to consider both life and death sentences).
State of Louisiana Versus Robert Celestine, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State v. Turner 267 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
3/7/97), ; State v. Taylor , supra ; State v. Smith , supra ; State v. Eaton , supra ; State v. Bates , (La.
State v. Mullen 269 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/7/97), , 656 ; , 644 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Stephen Bruno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Glyndale Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3/7/97), (citations omitted).
State v. Arceneaux 164 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hart, 96-697, p. 7 (La.3/7/97), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Brent Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Tony Garnell Pennywell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/11/00),] 776 So.2d [1134] at 1144; State v. Hart, 96-0697, pp. 16-17 (La.3/7/97), -62.
State v. Pennywell 139 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
[State v.] Bright [, 98-398,] at p. 15, [ (La.4/11/00),] 776 So.2d [1134] at 1144; State v. Hart, 96-0697, pp. 16-17 (La.3/7/97), -62 .
State of Louisiana v. Christopher K. Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/7/97), the defendant complained about three of the trial court‟s charges to the jury at the conclusion of the guilty phase of his trial, including the instruction regarding reasonable doubt.
State v. Mayeux 128 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
[isln State v. Hart, 96-697 (La.3/7/97), , the defendant complained about three of the trial court’s charges to the jury at the conclusion of the guilty phase of his trial, including the instruction regarding reasonable doubt.
State v. Christophe 102 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 821(E); and State v. Hart, 96-0697, pp. 16-17 (La.3/7/97), -62 .
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
See State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), (first degree murder conviction and death sentence set aside with instructions for district court to enter judgment of second degree murder and sentence of life imprisonment); (first degree murder conviction affirmed, death sentence vacated and remanded for imposition of life s
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
75 , 145 L.Ed.2d 64 (1999) (no abuse of discretion for denying cause challenge for juror who stated that “in an appropriate case” she could return a life sentence); State v. Hart, 96-0697, pp. 7-10 (La.3/7/97), -58 (approving denial of cause challenge against juror who believed that the death penalty for an intentional killing “ought to be the law,” but agreed to abide by the judge’s instructions and to consider both life and death sentences).
State v. Williams 69 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Relying upon State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), , and La.
State v. Montejo 974 So. 2d 1238 La. 2008
[72] See State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), (first degree murder conviction and death sentence set aside with instructions for trial court to enter judgment of second degree murder and sentence of life imprisonment); (La.
State v. Allen 955 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[ See, State v. Hart, 96-697 (La.3/7/97), , where the Louisiana Supreme Court relegated defendant's claim that his counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an insanity defense to post conviction relief.]
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
In State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), , this court upheld the denial of a cause challenge against a juror who believed that the death penalty for an intentional killing "ought to be the law," but agreed to abide by the judge's instructions and to consider both life and death sentences.
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
75 , 145 L.Ed.2d 64 (1999) (no abuse of discretion for denying cause challenge for juror who stated that "in an appropriate case" she could return a life sentence); State v. Hart, 96-0697, pp. 7-10 (La.3/7/97), -58 (approving denial of cause challenge against juror who believed that the death penalty for an intentional killing "ought to be the law," but agreed to abide by the judge's instructions and to consider both life and death sentences).
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
Similarly, in State v. Hart, 96-0697, pp. 7-10 (La.3/7/97), -658 , we upheld the trial court's denial of a cause challenge against a juror who believed that the death penalty for an intentional killing "ought to be the law," but who agreed to abide by the judge's instructions and to consider both life and death as possible sentences.
State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
State v. Hart, 96-0697, p. 5 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Taylor 875 So. 2d 58 La. 2004
State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), ; State v. Maxie, 93-2158 (La.4/10/95), .
State v. Van Sales 867 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), , and cases cited therein.
State v. White 850 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/07/97), ; State v. Divers, 94-0756 (La.9/5/96), , cert.
State v. Robinson 833 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), ; State v. Richardson, 33,272 (La.App.2d Cir.11/1/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/26/01), ; State v. Loyd, 35,637 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/02), .
Followed State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
See State v. Hart , 96-0697 at p. 5 (La.3/7/97), ().
State v. Johnson 821 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Hart, 96-0679 (La.03/07/97), , and cases cited therein.
State v. Anderson 786 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.03/07/97), .
State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
1639, 1642-43 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961); State v. Hart, 96-0697, p. 6 (La.3/7/97)
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
Brumfield, 737 So.2d at 668 ; State v. Hart, 96-0697, p. 15 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
In State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), , this court upheld the denial of a cause challenge against a juror who believed that the death penalty for an intentional killing "ought to be the law," but agreed to abide by the judge's instructions and to consider both life and death sentences.
State v. Richardson 779 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hart, 96-0679 (La.3/07/97) , and cases cited therein.
State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
In State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), , this court upheld the denial of a cause challenge against a juror who believed that the death penalty for an intentional killing "ought to be the law," but agreed to abide by the judge's instructions and to consider both life and death sentences.
State v. Harris 765 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), , and cases cited therein.
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
[29] See State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), (first degree murder conviction and death sentence set aside, due to insufficient evidence to support first degree murder, with instructions for trial court to enter judgment of second degree murder and sentence of life imprisonment); (first degree murder conviction affirmed, d
State v. Bright 776 So. 2d 1134 La. 2000
State v. Ortiz , 96-1609, p. 20, 701 So.2d at 934 ; see also State v. Hart, 96-0697, pp. 16-17 (La.3/7/97), -62
State v. Lucky 755 So. 2d 845 La. 1999
State v. Hart, 96-0697, p. 10 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
State v. Brumfield, 96-2667 (La.10/20/98), ; State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Watts 735 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
For example, in State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the record was insufficient to fully explore the defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel where the defendant asserted, inter alia, that his counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an insanity defense.
State v. Castleberry 758 So. 2d 749 La. 1999
State v. Brumfield, 96-2667 (La.10/20/98), ; State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Singleton 723 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Wafer 719 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
P. art. 841; State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), .
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
State v. Hart, 96-0697, p. 10 (La.3/7/97), ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 7 (La.2/28/96), .
State v. Rose 708 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Hart, 96-0697 (La.3/7/97), .