Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 708 So. 2d 703.

119 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. James Derek Person, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
1/21/98), opinion corrected (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Lawrence Sly La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Victor D. Guillory A/K/A Victory Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
See State v. Williams, 96–1023 (La.1/21/98), –22, cert.
State Of Louisiana v. Donovan Darville La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
1/21/98), 61 In Williams, this Court held that “when a potential juror indicates his or her attitude regarding the mitigating circumstances would substantially impair his or her ability to return a death penalty, then that juror is properly excludab
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Kentrell Hickerson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
State Of Louisiana v. Carlos Alberto Rodriguez La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Peterson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
1/21/98), 714).10 Thus, while seeking to elicit whether a prospective juror is capable of remaining impartial in the case at hand, counsel must maintain a careful balance of providing jurors with enough information to indicate whether they can return a sentence of death, but not
State v. Kitts 250 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker Stafford -Aka- Derrick Stafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Similarly, in State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98), -726, cert.
State v. Stafford 241 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Similarly, in State v. Williams , 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98), , 725-726, cert.
State of Louisiana v. Marlon Frank Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Thomas 217 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/21/98), , opinion corrected, (La.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel Brandon Prince -Aka- Daniel B. Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Prince 211 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/21/98), , opinion corrected (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
1/21/98), -21 ; State v. Taylor, 93-2201 at p. 10, 669 So.2d at 370 ; State v. Bernard, 608 So.2d at 972 .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
1/21/98), (holding that the State’s articulated reason for striking a prospective juror because she appeared “weak .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
State v. Johnson 187 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), .
State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; [State v. Clark, [01-2087, p. 15 (La.App.
State v. Wallace 185 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
494 , 169 L.Ed.2d 346 (2007); State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), -26 , cert.
State v. Taylor 165 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
State v. Simonson 163 So. 3d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 9/25/02), (citing State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), ; State v. Casey, 99-0023, p. 17 (La.1/26/00), ).
State v. Mills 153 So. 3d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
State v. Cushenberry 146 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; Clark; State v. Ricard, 98-2278, 99-0424 (La.App.
State v. Gordon 146 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/25/02), (citing State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), ).
State v. Haynes 144 So. 3d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
State v. Wilson 138 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
State v. Sippio 133 So. 3d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. *301 Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), .
State v. Celestine 131 So. 3d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; Clark, State v. Ricard, 98-2278, 99-0424 (La.App.
State v. Augustine 131 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), ; Clark; State v. Ricard, 98-2278, 99-0424 (La.App.
State v. Allen 129 So. 3d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Robertson, 08-297 at 12-13, 995 So.2d at 659-60 (citing State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), cert.
State v. Mitchell 125 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Robertson , 08-297 at 12-13, 995 So.2d at 659 -60 (citing State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
(“The Court has warned prosecutors they are not to turn closing argument into a plebiscite on crime.”); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
State v. Bailey 126 So. 3d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Supreme Court, in State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , held that while a prosecutor may not give his personal opinion regarding the veracity of a witness, it is permissible for him to draw inferences about a witness’s truthfulness from matters on the record.
State v. Day 119 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Similarly, in State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98), -726 , cert.
State v. Napoleon 119 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
State v. Cleveland 115 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
State v. Grimes 109 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
State v. Garcia 108 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
eturned to restaurant, shot and killed two people, and injured two others during the course of an armed robbery); State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.10/19/99), (defendant and co-defendant shot and killed police officer escorting grocery store manager who was making a night deposit); State v. Brumfield, 96-2667 (La.10/20/98), (same); State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), (defendant murdered victim while attempting to rob him in his truck; earlier that day, defendant had shot and wounded another vi
State of Louisiana v. Johnny W. Chambers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1/21/98)
State v. Everett 96 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Larry Joseph McKithern La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. McKithern 93 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
|1sIn State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), , cert.
State v. Jones 85 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See also State v. Williams, 96-1023, p. 30 (La.1998), -26 (evidence demonstrating that the defendant shot a man during a robbery just hours before the crime charged was admissible in a first-degree murder prosecution because evidence of the earlier shooting was relevant to show that the defendant intended to fire the gun at the *232 victim even though he claimed that