Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 700 So. 2d 493.
- State of Louisiana Versus Cornell Bolden La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
-
State of Louisiana v. Matthew Tyler Hayes
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
10/21/97), two cases that address the effect of custody on a petition for post-conviction relief, are not dispositive of the question now before us. The following language from Smith, 700 5 So.2d at 495, best highlights how it and Becnel are distinguishable from the present mat
- State of Louisiana Versus Jason Dufrene La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Mario Surus La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
State v. Solorzano
85 So. 3d 101
La. 2012
art. 924; State v. Smith, 96-1798, p. 4-6 (La.10/21/97), -96 .
-
State v. Solorzano
85 So. 3d 101
La. 2012
art. 924; State v. Smith, 96-1798, p. 4-6 (La.10/21/97), -96 .
-
STATE EX REL. JACKSON v. State
82 So. 3d 279
La. 2012
art. 924(2); State v. Smith, 96-1798 (La.10/21/97), .
-
State ex rel. Jackson v. State
82 So. 3d 279
La. 2012
art. 924(2); State v. Smith, 96-1798 (La.10/21/97), .
-
STATE EX REL. SPANN v. State
17 So. 3d 952
La. 2009
See also State v. Smith, 96-1798, p. 4-6 (La.10/21/97), -96 (analyzing custody requirement in light of State ex rel.
-
State ex rel. Spann v. State
17 So. 3d 952
La. 2009
See also State v. Smith, 96-1798, p. 4-6 (La.10/21/97), -96 (analyzing custody requirement in light of State ex rel.
-
State v. Ganser
925 So. 2d 1242
La. 2006
See State v. Smith, 96-1798, pp. 4-6 (La.10/21/97), -96 .
-
State v. Denson
888 So. 2d 805
La. 2004
10/21/97), -96 (analyzing State ex rel.
-
State Ex Rel. Brown v. State
870 So. 2d 976
La. 2004
See State v. Smith, 96-1798, pp. 5-6 (La.10/21/97), .
-
State v. Tran
793 So. 2d 172
La. 2001
art. 924; State v. Smith, 96-1798, p. 4-6 (La.10/21/97), -96 .
-
State v. Ferris
762 So. 2d 601
La. 2000
14:98 was considered by this court in State v. Smith, 96-1798 (La.10/21/97), .
-
Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Department of Finance
720 So. 2d 1186
La. 1998
1556 , 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968); State v. Smith, 96-1798 (La.10/21/97), , it has frequently been applied in the civil context.