DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jyles, 704 So. 2d 241.

637 citing documents.

  • State v. Wingerter 926 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 6/25/96), [4] See, State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 3 (La.12/12/97), ( per curiam ).
  • State v. Batton 920 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Torres 919 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , , and expanded by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ( per curiam ).
  • State v. Williams 914 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    See State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Cole 900 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    12/12/97), (per curiam).
  • State v. Leonard 892 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5th Cir.6/25/96), [3] , and *69 expanded by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669, p. 3 (La.12/12/97), (per curiam).
  • State ex rel. Cook v. State 884 So. 2d 593 La. 2004
    If appointed counsel, after a review of the record, finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he or she may follow the procedures set out in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , State v. Mouton, 95-0981 (La.4/28/95), (La.App.
  • State v. Singleton 871 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    See Anders, supra; State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Givens 871 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Defense counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Willis 868 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Pearson 861 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court revisited the Anders procedures outlined in State v. Benjamin, supra , and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, supra , and stated that the brief filed by defense counsel "must review not only the procedural history of the case and the evidence presented at trial but must also
  • State v. Davis 861 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Sanders 861 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Peters 855 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    4th Cir.1990), and filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Samuels 847 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Lofton v. Whitley, 905 F.2d 885 (5th Cir.1990); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Martin 844 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Crawford 848 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Jefferson 837 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    On appeal, the defendant's appointed counsel filed a brief and motion pursuant to State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , in which he asserted that he could find no appealable issues.
  • State v. Johnson 833 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Grainer 834 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Brister 829 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); , the supreme court stated: Counsel must demonstrate to the appellate court by full discussion and analysis that he has cast an advocate’s eye over the trial record and considered whether any ruling made by the trial court, subject to the contemporaneous objection rule, had a significant, adverse impact on shaping the
  • State v. Bagneris 830 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Juarbe 824 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    On May 25, 1999, Juarbe was granted an out of time appeal because his original appeal was found to be inadequate pursuant to State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Boisseau 825 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Brooks 817 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Jackson 809 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Anderson 807 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    5th Cir.6/25/96), , and expanded by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Antoine 804 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    See State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); .
  • State v. Henton 803 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Defendant's appointed counsel filed a brief and motion pursuant to State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , in *406 which she asserted that she could find no appealable issues.
  • State v. Gordon 803 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Counsel adequately complied with the provisions of State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Jordan 802 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    5th Cir.6/25/96), , and expanded by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Jackson 800 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Jones 799 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Motion to Withdraw The supreme court clarified the requirements of an Anders brief in State v. Jyles, 96-2669, pp. 2-3 (La.12/12/97); -42 (alteration in original): An Anders brief need not catalog tediously every meritless objection made at trial or by way of pre-trial motions *776 with a labored explanation of why the objections all lack merit.
  • State v. Cunningham 801 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Lofton v. Whitley, 905 F.2d 885 (5th Cir.1990); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. King 804 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Grimmett 794 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Jackson 794 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; State v. Bradford, 96-929 (La.App.
  • State v. Christoff 788 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court revisited the Anders procedures outlined in State v. Benjamin, supra , and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, supra , and stated that the brief filed by defense counsel "must review not only the procedural history of the case and the evidence presented at trial but must also
  • State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    |4On 20 December 2000 this Court issued an order in which it noted that the brief filed by appellate counsel in the original appeal, 96-KA-2201, did not comply with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , and Tapp had re-urged his original assignments of error.
  • State v. Antoine 790 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Finding counsel’s brief does not satisfy the requirements for such a brief as explained by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); , we deny counsel’s motion to withdraw and instruct him to file a new brief.
  • State v. Holmes 787 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Winding 787 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    On November 3, 1998, this court granted defendant a second out-of-time appeal pursuant to State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Morgan 785 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Fox 784 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court revisited the Anders procedures outlined in State v. Benjamin, supra, and adopted by this Court in State v. Bradford, supra, and stated that the brief filed by defense counsel “must review not only the procedural history of the case and the' evidence presented at trial but must also
  • State v. Battles 788 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State ex rel. Taylor v. State 786 So. 2d 110 La. 2001
    If counsel finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may withdraw, but only after fulfilling the requirements for review and analysis of the record as set out in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Following an application for post-conviction relief, this out of time appeal was granted on February 9, 2000, pursuant to State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Williams 782 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Counsel filed a *86 brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Washington 782 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , , and expanded by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Washington 782 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 6/25/96) , , and expanded by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .