DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jyles, 704 So. 2d 241.

637 citing documents.

  • State v. Caston 778 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Charles 775 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4th Cir.1990), and refined in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Jones 774 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Prudhomme 808 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    For the following reasons, we deny defense counsel’s motion to withdraw and instruct him to file a new brief which complies with the guidelines set forth in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); .
  • State v. Morgan 769 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. McGinnis 768 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    See also, State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Hunter 760 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Nguyen 760 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , the Supreme Court revisited the procedures outlined in State v. Benjamin, and stated that, “the brief filed by counsel must review not only the procedural history of the case and the evidence presented at trial but must also provide ...
  • State v. Sherman 761 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Counsel filed a brief complying with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Courtney 761 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); , the supreme court stated: Counsel must demonstrate to the appellate court by full discussion and analysis that he has cast an advocate's eye over the trial record and considered whether any ruling made by the trial court, subject to the contemporaneous *114 objection rule, had a significant, adverse impact on shapin
  • State v. Sepulvado 756 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    In brief, defendant’s counsel also provided a procedural history of the case and detailed various aspects of the case as required by State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Dilks 750 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    2094 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967); State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Jordan 747 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); , recently discussed in detail what is required in an Anders brief: An Anders brief need not catalog tediously every meritless objection made at trial or by way of pre-trial motions with a labored explanation of why the objections all lack merit....
  • State v. Crawford 749 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Pursuant to Anders and State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , appellate counsel states that he has forwarded to defendant a copy of the brief which he filed with this Court and he has filed a motion to withdraw.
  • State v. Jackson 746 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Turning now to the Anders analysis, in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , (La.App.
  • State v. Watts 746 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    On appeal, defense counsel filed a brief in conformity with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), [1] and Anders v. California.
  • State v. Edgerson 742 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , (La.App.
  • State ex rel. Lapell v. State 745 So. 2d 613 La. 1999
    If counsel finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may withdraw, but only after fulfilling the requirements for review and analysis of the record as set out in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Rankin 741 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Brown 738 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , (La.App.
  • State v. Bagemehl 737 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Additionally, in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , the Supreme Court revisited the procedures outlined in State v. Benjamin, supra , and stated that "the brief filed by counsel must review not only the procedural history of the case and the evidence presented at trial but must also provide...
  • State v. Larrivere 733 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); , the supreme court stated: Counsel must demonstrate to the appellate court by full discussion and analysis that he has cast an advocate's eye over the trial record and considered whether any ruling made by the trial court, subject to the contemporaneous objection rule, had a significant, adverse impact on shaping the
  • State v. McGhee 739 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir.1990) and the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Fields 732 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    5th Cir. 6/25/96), and expanded by the Supreme Court in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Harrell 727 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Recently in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , the Supreme Court expounded on the holding in Anders .
  • State v. Merricks 724 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Counsel’s brief complied with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Clark 720 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    STATEMENT OF THE CASE This case is on remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State ex rel. Wallace v. State 726 So. 2d 4 La. 1998
    If counsel finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may withdraw, but only after fulfilling the requirements for review and analysis of the record as set out in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Naquin 719 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Counsel filed a supplemental brief and complied with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Reynolds 716 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    SUFFICIENCY OF ANDERS BRIEF In State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , (La.App.
  • State ex rel. Nicholson v. State 720 So. 2d 675 La. 1998
  • State v. Freeman 719 So. 2d 1273 La. 1998
    If counsel finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may withdraw, but only after fulfilling the requirements for review and analysis of the record as set out in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State ex rel. Miller v. State 719 So. 2d 62 La. 1998
    If counsel finds no basis for assigning error on appeal, he may withdraw, but only after fulfilling the requirements for review and analysis of the record as set out in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State, in Interest of Ldl 714 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    The supreme court clarified the requirements of an Anders brief in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97); .
  • State ex rel. Ventry v. State 717 So. 2d 1155 La. 1998
    If counsel finds no basis for assigning error on appeal he may withdraw, but only after fulfilling the requirements for review and analysis of the record as set out in State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Clark 717 So. 2d 1165 La. 1998
    This case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration in light of State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), .
  • State v. Scott 709 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    In compliance with State v. Jyles, 96-2669 (La.12/12/97), , counsel's brief indicates that he has reviewed potential assignments of error, but can find none worthy of appeal.