Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reeder v. North, 701 So. 2d 1291.

155 citing documents.

Sarah Allen Davidson v. Terrance Hardy La. 2026
Steva Lowery v. Southern University at Shreveport, Vladimir Alexander Appeaning, Jorge E. Sousa, Thaddeus Morris, and Beverly Morris La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
10/21/97), Bilyeu Bucks v. DirecTECH Sw., 52,474 (La.
Kathleen Welch and Carroll Dewayne Welch v. United Medical Healthwest-New Orleans L.L.C. and United Medical Healthcare Inc. La. 2025
Succession of Clarence Donald Fox La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Kim S. Tumminello and Tim Tumminello, Individually, and on Behalf of Savanna Tumminello Versus Regel L. Bisso La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
10/21/97), -96; Gaudet v. Coregis Insurance Co., 97-130 (La.
The Descendants Project Versus Port of South Louisiana, Ryan Burks, and D. Paul Robichaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Conti Enterprises, Inc. v. Providence/GSE Associates, LLC, Robert E. Williams, Jr, and Aspen Specialty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Randy Boyett, Gary Cain, Michael B. Cockerham, Ted Hayes, Raymond J. Lasseigne, C.A. "Jackie" Lewis, Mike Pearson, Robert … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
10/21/97), Bilyeu Bucks v. DirecTECH Sw., 52,474 (La.
John Hill and Nancy George, on Behalf of Their Daughter, Kayomoniqic George v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
10/21/97), the law takes a liberal approach toward allowing amended pleadings to promote the interests of justice.
Jamie LaBranche v. Louisiana Department of Justice AG Jeff Landry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Narda Matos and Altagracia Matos, on Behalf of Lidia Matos Versus Edward White, Jr., Blair Logistics, LLC and … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
LARRY BIZE, SR. AND v. VERSUS La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Ourso, 02-1978 at p. 4, 842 So.2d at 349; Hebert, 486 So.2d at 723; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97)
Catherine J. Estis, Samuel C. Estis and Thuy P. Estis v. Clifton L. Mills, Kimberly M. Mills, Twin … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Td Auto Finance, LLC v. Perry W. Myles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Broxlin T. Coleman Versus Ace Property & Casualty Ins. Co. / Esis & Brock Services, LLC La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Evan A. Cooper v. Stephen C. Poss, Amanda Stout, and McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/ 21/ 97), - 97; Garner v. IF 1 1 1 1.
Harold Breaux, Sr. v. Terry B. Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
9:5605(B) clearly provides that the one and three year periods are peremptive, in Reeder v. North, 97–0239 (La.10/21/97), this Court held that the three-year period was peremptive and thus, the plaintiff’s claim was time-barred because he did not file his action three years from the date of the negligent act, even though he did not discover the basis for his claim until after that time period had expired.
Bucks v. DirecTECH Southwest 266 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
10/21/97), ; Hibernia Nat'l Bank v. Antonini , 33,436 (La.
Rismiller v. Gemini Ins. Co. 263 So. 3d 1145 La. 2019
Kinnett v. Kinnett 243 So. 3d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/21/97), , 1299-1300, relying on Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc. , 94-1238 (La.
Karen Cohen Kinnett Versus Jarred Brandon Kinnett La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
10/21/97), -1300, relying on Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.
Jackson v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., L.L.C. 243 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Robinson v. Wayne & Beverly Papania & Pyrenees Investments, LLC 207 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
River Parish Financial Services, LLC v. Gill 186 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
Titus v. Wilson 216 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
CONTINUOUS REPRESENTATION Continuous representation is “a suspension principle based on contra non valentem,” and “cannot apply to peremp-tive periods.” Reeder v. N., 97-0239, p. 12 (La.10/21/97), .
Bilyeu v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh 184 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; Walton v. Burns, 47,388 (La.App.
Draughn Koonce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Reeder v. North, 97–0239 (La.10/21/97)
Explained Koonce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 172 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Michael Dole, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Reeder v. North, 97–0239 (La.10/21/97)
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Dole 165 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Darver, L.L.C. v. Burch 163 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Cote' v. Hiller 162 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Starns, supra, citing, Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
Miralda v. Gonzalez 160 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Moreover, the Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized the clear legislative intent of this statute and its “perceived inequities.” Vazquez , 12-1694 at p. 7, 119 So.3d at 905 (citing Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 9 (La.10/21/97), , and Jenkins, supra).
Town of Sterlington v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury 150 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Reeder v. North, 1997-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
In Re: Angela Marie Costanza and Chasity Shanelle Brewer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 14 (La.10/21/97), Williams v. State, Dept. of Health & Hospitals, 95-0713, p. 4 (La.1/26/96), Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94- 1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65.
Garner v. Lizana 131 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
Reeder v. North, 97-239 (La.10/21/97), .
Vagelos v. Abramson 126 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
9:5605’s deadlines as peremptive in the landmark case, Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 9 (La.10/2/97), -96 .
Brown v. Schonekas 122 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
See Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
Smart v. Vazquez 119 So. 3d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 9 (La.10/21/97), , and in Jenkins , the Supreme Court recognized the clear legislative intent of this statute, as well as its “perceived inequities.” The majority in Reeder noted: [Tjhere is no doubt that the Legislature intended that three years after the “act, omission, or neglect,” the cause of action is extinguished, regardl
Hodges v. Reasonover 103 So. 3d 1069 La. 2012
10/21/97) , the strict per-emptive periods for legal malpractice claims cannot be interrupted or suspended by the filing of a petition for arbitration.
Tin, Inc. v. Washington Parish Sheriff's Office 97 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 3458; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ).
Livingston Parish School Board ex rel. Sales & Use Tax Division v. Louisiana Machinery Co. 98 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 3458; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ).
Dwyer v. Binegar 95 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 9 (La.10/21/97), .
Diaz v. Nicosia, Licciardi & Nunez, LLC 94 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), ; Naghi v. Brener, 08-2527, p. 4 (La.6/26/09), 17 |4So.3d 919, 922, and, more recently, Jenkins v. Starns, 11-1170, p. 2 (La.1/24/12), .
Gibsland Bank and Trust Company v. Kitchens Benton Kitchens & Black (Aplc) 85 So. 3d 688 La. 2012
As I stated in my dissent in Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), , “if a client is required to file suit against his attorney while the suit is being litigated and before a judgment is definitive, the client is placed in the untenable position of asserting that a judgment is both valid and invalid.” Reeder, 701 So.2d at 1300 .
Smart v. Vazquez 85 So. 3d 689 La. 2012
As I stated in my dissent in Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), , “if a client is required to file suit against his attorney while the suit is being litigated and before a judgment is definitive, the client is placed in the untenable position of asserting that a judgment is both valid and invalid.” Reeder, 701 So.2d at 1300 .
Zeno v. Alex 89 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Reeder v. *1227 North, 97-239 (La.10/21/97), .
West Baton Rouge Parish Revenue Department v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, L.L.C. 91 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 3458; Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97), .
Jenkins v. Starns 85 So. 3d 612 La. 2012
Judge McClendon instead found Naghi and Reeder v. North, 97-0239 (La.10/21/97); , more relevant to the instant case.
Stewart v. Continental Casualty Co. 79 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
|s5ee Reeder v. North, 97-0239, pp. 9-10 (La.10/21/97), .