Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wise v. JE Merit Constructors, Inc., 707 So. 2d 1214.

95 citing documents.

Thomas Southern v. Servpro D E Investments and LWCC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
1/21/98), Jenson v. Berry Global Group, supra.
Donald Jenson v. Berry Global Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
1/21/98), Griffith, supra.
Ronnie Griffith v. CMR Construction & Maintenance Resources and LCTA Workers' Compensation La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
12 1/21/98), Beck, supra; Freeman, supra.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.N. & B.N. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
1/21/98), n.2 (“Defense counsel actually moved for a directed verdict.
Michael Spillman v. Career Adventures, Inc., and Risk Savers, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
1/21/98), the preemployment questionnaire, which the claimant completed in 1994, inquired whether the claimant ever had arthritis or knee problems using a “yes” or “no” format.
Donald Tanks v. Cb&i, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98)
Malvilen Cook v. St. Genevive Health Care Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684, p. 7 (La.1/2/98), See also Taylor v. G.W.
Ralph Weaver v. Chicago Bridge & Iron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97–0684 (La.1/21/98)
Galliano v. CB & I, LLC 275 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Lovas v. Gallagher Bassett Servs., Inc. 267 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1/21/98), , 1217 ("A claimant's untruthful statement regarding his permanent partial disability which prejudices his employer's ability to seek reimbursement from the fund gives rise to an affirmative defense under La.
Turner v. Chi. Bridge & Iron Co. 251 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1/21/98), ; Dugas v. AutoZone, Inc. , 2012-727 (La.
Guichard Operating Co. v. Porche 212 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Marlon Lavalais v. Gilchrist Construction Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1/2/98), see 4 Gilchrist did not claim that Mr. Lavalais answers affected its ability to recover from “the second injury fund.” 7 also Taylor v. G.W.
Lavalais v. Gilchrist Construction Co. 158 So. 3d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684, p. 7 (La.1/2/98), ; see | ffilso Taylor v. G.W.
National Fire Union Insurance Co. v. State Worker's Compensation Second Injury Board 168 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), .
George R. Harris v. Twin City Electric, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98)
Harris v. Twin City Electric, LLC 92 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), .
Scardino v. LUBA 92 So. 3d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), , the court explained the difference between these two anti-fraud forfeiture statutes.
Beck v. Newt Brown Contractors, LLC 72 So. 3d 982 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), ; Thomas v. Hollywood Casino, supra; Freeman v. Chase, supra; Risk Management Services v. Ashley, 38,431 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/04), , writ denied, 04-1481 (La.9/24/04), .
John Thibodeaux v. Mechanical Construction Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98)
Cheryl F. Benoit v. Ace Transportation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Thibodeaux v. Mechanical Construction Co. 52 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98), .
Benoit v. ACE Transportation 51 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98), .
Ronald Babin v. Ernest P. Breaux Electrical, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Babin v. Ernest P. Breaux Electrical, Inc. 49 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684, p. 15 (La.1/21/98), .
Billy Jo Massingill v. Dunham Price Group, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98)
Massingill v. Dunham Price Group, L.L.C. 38 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98), .
Edward Trent, Jr. v. Triad Electric & Controls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Trent v. Triad Electric & Controls, Inc. 34 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98), .
Hurt v. JAMES T. GENTRY TRUCKING CO., INC. 31 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Merit Constructors, Inc., 1997-0684 (La.1/21/98), ; Freeman v. Chase, supra.
LaFleur v. M. Langenstein & Sons, Inc. 16 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-C-0684 (La.1/21/1998), , the Supreme Court determined that “a direct relation is established when the subsequent injury was inevitable or very likely to occur because of the presence of the preexisting condition.” Id., 707 So.2d at 1220 .
Thomas v. Hollywood Casino 13 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Merit Constructors Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), ; Freeman v. Chase, supra.
Bobbie Jeffers v. Kentucky Fried Chicken La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98)
Jeffers v. Kentucky Fried Chicken 7 So. 3d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98), .
Donald Sanders v. the Shaw Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1/21/98), the supreme court held that proof of an untruthful statement alone is insufficient to forfeit an employee’s benefits.
Chester Armand v. Denton-James, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1/21/98), King v. Grand Cove Nursing Home, 93-779 (La.App.
Sanders v. SHAW GROUP 2 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98), , the supreme court held that proof of an untruthful statement alone is insufficient to forfeit an employee’s benefits.
Armand v. Denton-James, L.L.C. 2 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98), ; King v. Grand Cove Nursing Home, 93-779 (La.App.
City of Shreveport v. Casciola 980 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), ; Johnikin v. Jong's, Inc., 40,116 (La.App.
Brien v. Leon Angel Constructors, Inc. 978 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), .
Freeman v. Chase 974 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/21/98), ; Franklin v. HealthSouth, 41,458 (La.App.
James v. Express Marketing, Inc. 973 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors, Inc., 1997-684 (La.01/21/98), .
Roberts v. D & J Construction Co. 969 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), , the supreme court considered an employer’s defense under La.
Alexis v. ALTON OCHSNER FOUNDATION HOSP. 966 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684, p. 7 (La.1/21/98), .
Cotton v. First Fleet 957 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-684 (La.1/21/98), , in which the court found that similarly broad questions on an employer's questionnaire did not serve the purposes of the statute and were to be construed against the employer in determining whether the employee failed to give truthful *236 answers with regard to pre-existing medical questions.
Cherry Cotton v. First Fleet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1/21/98), in which the court found that similarly broad questions on an employer’s questionnaire did not serve the purposes of the statute and were to be construed against the employer in determining whether the employee failed to give truthful answers with regard to pre-existing medical questions.
Ocon v. Regency Motors of Metairie, LLC 957 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), .
Brooks v. MADISON PARISH SERVICE DIST. HOS. 954 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), ; Johnikin v. Jong's, Inc., 40,116 (La.App.
Doyal v. VERNON PARISH SCHOOL BD. 950 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98), .
Brian Doyal v. Vernon Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Merit Constructors, Inc., 97-0684 (La.1/21/98)

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by