Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 708 So. 2d 362.

177 citing documents.

Williams v. Leonard Chabert Medical Center 744 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 2 (La.3/4/98), .
Dufrene v. Morgan Equipment Rental, Inc. 754 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), , noting that a disputed issue of mixed fact and law or policy is peculiarly a question for the jury or trier of the facts.
Crucia v. State Farm Insurance 754 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
97-1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), .
Alexander v. City of Baton Rouge 739 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Ward v. ITT Specialty Risk Services, Inc. 739 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; George v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-850 (La.App.
Coulon v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 734 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp.3-5 (La.3/4/98); -65 .
Brasseaux v. Town of Mamou 736 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .
Calderone v. Dorignac's Food Center, Inc. 734 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
In Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), , the court held directly that the proper standard of review of a fact finder's determination of the question of whether a condition presents an unreasonable risk of harm is that of manifest error.
Nichols v. Northeast Louisiana University 729 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Ebarb v. Guinn Bros., Inc. 728 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Cazes v. Parish of West Baton Rouge 744 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp. 4-5 (La.3/4/98); -365 , the Supreme Court set forth the following pertinent analysis: Because a determination that a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm predominantly encompasses an abundance of factual findings, which differ greatly from case to case, followed by an application of those facts to a less-than-scientific st
George v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 722 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Later in Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); , the supreme court specified that such a determination is subject to review under the manifest error standard.
Pesson v. Reynolds 727 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Russell v. Noullet 721 So. 2d 868 La. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .
Dufrene v. Willingham 721 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 97-1174 (La[.]3/4/98), .
Biagas v. City of Eunice 721 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See, Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; McCarthy v. First Fin.
Ibieta v. Star Casino, Inc. 720 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 p. 1 (La.3/4/98), .
Borruano v. City of Plaquemine 720 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Dubois v. Economy Fire & Cas. Co. 715 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart, 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Brunet v. State 715 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
3/4/98); , (per curiam).
Godfrey v. Boston Old Colony Ins. Co. 718 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In the recent case of Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-C-1174 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that appellate courts should review findings of an unreasonable risk of harm under a manifest error standard.
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries 714 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 712 So. 2d 62 La. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
Kimbrell v. MacArthur Village Ltd. Partnership 712 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
*606 See also Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .
Brown v. Webster Parish School Board 716 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
See Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; McCarthy v. First Financial Ins., 30,015 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/10/97), ; Bison v. Primrose, 30,011 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/10/97), ; Killough v. Bituminous Cas.
Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. State Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 712 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 3 (La.3/4/98); .
Netecke v. State ex rel. DOTD 715 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .