DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 708 So. 2d 362.

177 citing documents.

  • Butkiewicz v. Evans 943 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), ; Joseph , 02-1996 at p. 4, 842 So.2d at 423 .
  • Buchignani v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 938 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Heflin v. American Home Wildwood Estates 936 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court noted that the surfaces of streets, sidewalks, and parking lots are commonly irregular.
  • Waller v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company 935 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Leonard v. Ryan's Family Steak Houses, Inc. 939 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp. 3-4 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Degges v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 911 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    To satisfy the second inquiry, she points to Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1997-1174 (La.3/4/98), , which held: In determining whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm, the trier of fact must balance the gravity and risk of harm against the individual and societal rights and obligations, the social utility, and the cost and feasibility of repair.
  • Bourquard v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 900 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 4 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Tenorio v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 893 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Reed v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Underwood v. Best Western Westbank, Inc. 881 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    The supreme court applied an unreasonable risk of harm analysis in the case of Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Bates v. Caruso 881 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Pamplin v. Bossier Parish Community College 878 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    See also, Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Michael Orr v. Otto Candies, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Orr v. Otto Candies, Inc. 875 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Johnson v. City of Monroe 870 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Higginbotham v. COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY 868 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Harriett Ardala Yates v. State of La, Thru the Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Yates v. State Department of Transportation & Development 862 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • McAdams v. Willis Knighton Medical Center 862 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    *1190 The supreme court also applied an unreasonable risk of harm analysis in the case of Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Reitzell v. Pecanland Mall Associates, Ltd. 852 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 844 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Borruano v. City of Plaquemine, 97-1926 (La.App.
  • Joseph v. City of New Orleans 842 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Irsch v. Argonaut Great Cent. Ins. Co. 841 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [7] Calcagno, supra, citing Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), -365 .
  • McGuire v. New Orleans City Park Imp. Ass'n 835 So. 2d 416 La. 2003
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98) ; Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Solito v. Horseshoe Entertainment 834 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Oster v. State, through Dep't of Transp.
  • Simmons v. King 833 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Celestine v. Union Oil Co. of California, 94-1868 (La.04/10/95), ; Boyle v. Board of Supervisors, Louisiana State University, 96-1158 (La.01/14/97), ; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Lanasa v. Harrison 828 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Reed v. Wal-Mart, 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 820 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Hicks v. State 802 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Calcagno v. Kuebel, Fuchs Partnership 802 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), -365 .
  • Shavers v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ETC. 807 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Leaman v. Continental Cas. Co. 798 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Kinko's also argues that Cooper failed to present any evidence to establish that Kinko's was negligent in maintaining its parking lot-especially in light of the Louisiana Supreme Court's ruling in Boyle v. Board of Supervisors, Louisiana State University, 96-1158 (La.1/14/97), and Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Priest v. City of Bastrop 792 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that in determining whether a defect presents an unreasonable risk of harm, the trier of fact must balance the gravity and risk of harm against the individual and societal rights and obligations, the social utility, and the cost and feasibility of repair.
  • Moody v. Blanchard Place Apartments 793 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    See also Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Bond v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 782 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    The requested instruction was taken from Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Bozeman v. State 787 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Lewis v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Snearl v. Mercer 780 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Rolf v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 782 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), -65 .
  • Dennis v. the Finish Line, Inc. 781 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), ; Borruano v. City of Plaquemine, 97-1926 (La.App.
  • Scott v. Pyles 770 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), ; Greenlee, 98-2522 at p. 4, 753 So.2d at 366 .
  • Kendall v. WEINGARTEN REALTY MGMT. CO. 769 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Gray v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 761 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Richardson v. City of Gramercy 772 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court resolved a split in the circuits by holding that the manifest error standard of review is the proper standard to be applied in cases involving findings of unreasonable risks of harm or unreasonably dangerous defects.
  • Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 756 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Consider Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp. 3-4 (La.3/4/98), , holding that whether a thing creates an unreasonable risk of harm is a mixed question of law and fact and, thus, subject to the manifest error standard of review.
  • Bailey v. Forest Hill Speedway 759 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Johnson v. Brookshire Grocery Co., Inc. 754 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Greenlee v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 753 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, p. 5 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Kugler v. Tangipahoa Parish School Bd. 752 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174, pp. 3-5 (La.3/4/98), -365 ; Pesson v. Reynolds, 97-0150, p. 7 (La.App.
  • Blackwell v. Bossier Parish School Board 747 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Rambo v. Webster Parish School Bd. 745 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Russell, supra; Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 746 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-1174 (La.3/4/98); .