DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 708 So. 2d 375.

155 citing documents.

  • Spell v. Baker Foundation 865 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    (emphasis ours) | ¿Accordingly, the supreme court noted in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 9-10 (La.3/4/98), , 381: *1054 LSA-RS 23:1317 mandates that the hearing office’s factual findings be based on “competent evidence.” This legislative mandate is necessary because under the express language of LSA-RS 23:1317, worker’s compensation hearing officers are “not bound by the technical rules of evidence.” Id.
  • Myrtle K. Latigue v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Latigue v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp. 861 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Phillips v. Joseph Management Services, Inc. 861 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Hookfin v. Advantage Nursing Services, Inc. 860 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Scuderi v. Crazy Johnnie Cafe, Inc., 02-243.
  • Mack v. Cerro Copper Tube 850 So. 2d 1005 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.03/04/98), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.07/01/97), ; Jones v. Ruskin Mfg., 36,548 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), ; Cox v. Roofing Supply, Inc., 36,275 (La.App.2d Cir.08/14/02), .
  • Frazier v. DELTIDE FISHING & RENTAL TOOL 848 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Scuderi v. Crazy Johnnie Cafe, Inc., 02-243.
  • Alix v. EZ Serve Corp. 846 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [8] 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), ; reh'g denied April 3, 1998.
  • Barbarin v. TLC Home Health 845 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5th Cir.1/12/00), ; Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Troutman v. Hart 844 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Mr. Hart cites Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.03/04/98), , for the position that all findings of the workers’ compensation judge must be based on compétent evidence.
  • Hudson v. EAST BATON ROUGE SCHOOL BD. 844 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 9-10 (La.3/4/98), (footnote omitted).
  • Hallaron v. JACOB'S ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 839 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), , citing Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 4 (La.12/02/97), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, 96-2840, p. 7 (La.7/1/97), ; Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of Corrections, 93-1305, p. 4 (La.2/28/94), ; Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-15
  • Armstrong v. Horseshoe Casino 839 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/4/98), .
  • Lapeyrouse v. East Bank Consolidated Fire Department 841 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Jones v. Ruskin Mfg. 834 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Burns v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 830 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    See Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Scuderi v. Crazy Johnnie Cafe, Inc. 831 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Abate v. City of Abbeville 827 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co. et al., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Cox v. Roofing Supply, Inc. 825 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Bolton v. BE & K CONST. 822 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 10 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Kaiser v. Western-Southern Ins. Co. 821 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Evans v. DeRidder Mun. Fire 815 So. 2d 61 La. 2002
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Lanthier v. Family Dollar Store 813 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 12-13 (La.3/4/98), , the supreme court stated: To give effect to the more relaxed evidentiary standards in LSA-RS 23:1317, we hold that the hearing officer has the discretion to admit hearsay evidence in worker's compensation proceedings.
  • LaFrance v. Weiser Security Service, Inc. 815 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In workers’ compensation cases, unlike in other civil cases, a workers’ compensation judge’s factual findings need only be based on “competent evidence.” Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 10 (La.3/4/98), (citing La.
  • Ville Platte Medical Center v. McGlynn 809 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Horne v. Lowe's Home Improvement 810 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    IsThe Davis court also cited Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), , for the proposition that under the relaxed evidentiary standards in workers’ compensation cases, hearsay evidence may be admitted in a contested trial.
  • Rhone v. Boh Brothers 804 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Maddox v. Anderson Trucking Services 801 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • White v. Fresenius Medical Care 801 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    See Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); ; Olander v. Schillileagh's, 99-1896 (La.App.
  • Gardner v. Nabors Offshore Corp. 800 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Chavis v. Northrop Grumman Corp. 798 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In Clophus v. Taco Bell Corp./Hot ‘N’ Now, *1219 Inc. 2 this court explained: The supreme court recently discussed the standard to be applied in reviewing factual findings in a workers’ compensation case in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 8-9 (La.3/4/98); -381 (citations omitted) as follows: Factual findings in worker’s compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Greenhill Nursing Home v. Ferguson 796 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “Thus, ‘if the [factfinder’s] findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.’ ” Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98); -81 (alteration in original) (citations omitted) (quoting Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 5 (La.12/2/97); (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
  • Montgomery v. Louisiana, DOTD 797 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    J¿LAW AND ANALYSIS Standard of Review: “Factual findings in worker’s compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.” Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-C-1225 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Whiddon v. Livingston Parish Council 809 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    App. 1 Cir. 11/5/99), , this court recognized a more relaxed evidentiary standard in an administrative hearing appeal as established by the Supreme Court in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Davis v. Petroleum Club of Lafayette 795 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Our supreme court in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); , has recognized that under the relaxed evidentiary standards in workers' compensation cases, hearsay evidence may be admitted in a contested trial.
  • Mitchell v. Brown Builders, Inc. 793 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Company, 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • LOUISIANA WORKERS'COMP. CORP. v. Gray 786 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    *315 Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Thibodeaux v. Sunland Const. 782 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Mouton v. State Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services 808 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1st Cir.11/5/99), , however, this court more recently applied a somewhat more relaxed evidentiary standard in an administrative hearing appeal as established by the Supreme Court in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Marks v. 84 Lumber Co. 771 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    "Thus, `if the [factfinder's] findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.'" Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 8-9 (La.3/4/98); -81 (alteration in original) (citations omitted) ( quoting Seal v. Gaylord Container Corp., 97-0688, p. 5 (La.12/2/97); ( quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
  • La. Household Goods v. La. Public Serv. 762 So. 2d 1081 La. 2000
    See Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co. 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Olander v. Schillileagh's 759 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Ckaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Seales v. Ryder Integrated Logistics 751 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Because the issues before us involve factual determinations, the standard of review is that of manifest error, Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Spreadbury v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY 745 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 9-14 (La.3/4/98), -383 .
  • Leson Chevrolet, Inc. v. Triche 742 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    This was held in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co.
  • Lummus v. Shoney's 738 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), , the court held that “competent evidence” is such evidence as “has some degree of reliability and trustworthiness and is of the type that reasonable persons would rely upon.” (At 382).
  • Ricaud v. Holloway Sportswear, Inc. 741 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98); .
  • Odom v. International Paper Co. 736 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    The Louisiana Supreme Court recently addressed the admissibility and use of hearsay evidence in workers' compensation proceedings in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Clophus v. Taco Bell Corp./HotN'Now 732 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    The supreme court recently discussed the standard to be applied in reviewing factual findings in a workers' compensation case in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 8-9 (La.3/4/98); -381 (citations omitted) as follows: Factual findings in worker's compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Araujo v. Marriott Corp. 731 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), ; Langley v. Bechtel Co., 97-260 (La.App.