DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 708 So. 2d 375.

155 citing documents.

  • Kermit Richard v. Vermilion Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    e articles that have been provided by Dr. Ally.” Likewise, counsel stated that she did not “have an objection, in general, to [Dr. Ally’s] testimony.” The objection made was solely “to the extent that his testimony includes discussions regarding the articles.” 13 In Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 9-10 (La.3/4/98), (footnote omitted, emphasis in original), our supreme court discussed the relaxed rules of evidence applicable to workers’ compensation proceedings as follows: [Louis
  • Richard v. Vermilion Hospital 41 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    ly’s records.” Rather, the objection raised by counsel was “to the articles that have been provided by Dr. Ally.” Likewise, counsel stated that she did not “have an objection, in general, to [Dr. Ally’s] testimony.” The objection made was solely “to the extent that his testimony includes discussions regarding the articles.” In Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 9-10 (La.3/4/98), (footnote omitted, emphasis in original), our supreme court discussed the relaxed rules of evidence
  • Wilson v. General Motors Corp. 37 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    See, Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.03/04/98), ; Odom v. International Paper Co., 31,826 (La.App.2d Cir.05/05/99), .
  • Albert Journet, Jr. v. Greene's Energy Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3/4/98), (footnote omitted, emphasis in original), our supreme court discussed the relaxed rules of evidence applicable to workers’ compensation proceedings as follows: [Louisiana Revised Statutes] 23:1317 mandates that the hearing officer’s factual findings be based on “competent evidence.”
  • Journet v. Greene's Energy Group 20 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 9-10 (La.3/4/98), (footnote omitted, emphasis in original), our supreme court discussed the relaxed rules of evidence applicable to workers’ compensation proceedings as follows: [Louisiana Revised Statutes] 23:1317 mandates that the hearing officer’s factual findings be based on “competent evidence.” LA.REV.STAT.
  • Hirachi v. Kamata 15 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Zavala v. St. Joe Brick Works 999 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply, Co., 97-1225, pp. 9-10 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Petticrew v. Abacus Capital Corp. 974 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), ; Parr , 06-320 at 3, 946 So.2d at 180 .
  • Turner v. DELTA BEV. GROUP/PEPSI AMERICA 973 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 8-9 (La.3/4/98), -381 .
  • Jennings v. Ryan's Family Steak House 984 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    The court in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co, 97-1225, pp. 9-10 (La.3/4/98), , explained that La.R.S.
  • R. E. Heidt Construction Co. v. Henry Francis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3/4/98), stated the following: Factual findings in worker’s compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • RE HEIDT CONST. CO. v. Francis 970 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Our Louisiana Supreme Court, in Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 9 (La.3/4/98), , stated the following: Factual findings in worker's compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Baker v. TMSEL 970 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Chaisson v. Cajun *1098 Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Scuderi v. Crazy Johnnie Cafe, Inc., 02-243.
  • Sheryl Charles v. Lake Charles Memorial Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3/4/98), -382 (footnote omitted): LSA-RS 23:1317 mandates that the hearing officer’s factual findings be based on “competent evidence.” LA.REV.STAT.
  • Porter v. Pellerin Construction Co. 958 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Ocon v. Regency Motors of Metairie, LLC 957 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), ; Hookfin v. Advantage Nursing Services, Inc., 03-340 (La.App.
  • Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 953 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Barbarin v. TLC Home Health, 02-1054, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Brock v. Frymasters 942 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply, 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), ; Mitchell v. Brown Builders Inc., 35,022 (La.App.
  • Parr v. US Exp. Enterprises, Inc. 946 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 932 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 16 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Roberts v. Thibodaux Healthcare Center 934 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Blanchard v. Rental Service Corp., USA 920 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Hookfin v. Advantage Nursing Services, Inc., 03-340, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Arias v. Certified Coating, Inc. 924 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Barbarin v. TLC Home Health, 02-1054, p. 3 (La.
  • Robbins v. State, Department of Culture, Recreation & Tourism 922 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 1997-1225, p. 8-9 (La.3/4/98), -81 , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard of review to be applied to factual findings in workers’ compensation cases: Factual findings in worker’s compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
  • Rogers v. Wackenhut Services, Inc. 921 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5th Cir.4/29/03), ; Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Bartholomew v. Rhorer Mutual Industries 919 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Barbarin v. TLC Home Health, 02-1054, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Handy v. Tembec 927 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 9 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Chaisson v. Philip Services Corp. 917 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Michael Chaisson v. Philip Services Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Costales v. Turner Industries 905 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Bonvillain v. Preferred Industries and LWCC 917 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Smith v. State 899 So. 2d 516 La. 2005
    See Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 7-8 n. 1 (La.3/4/98), , 380 n. 1.
  • Moore v. Conagra Poultry Co. 893 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    See Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.03/04/98), , wherein the court noted: To give effect to the more relaxed evidentiary standards in LSA-RS 23:1317, we hold that the hearing officer has the discretion to admit hearsay evidence in worker's compensation proceedings.
  • Crescent City Const., Inc. v. Camper 898 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    [5] Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Cenacle Retreat House v. Dubose 888 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Hookfin v. Advantage Nursing Services, Inc., 03-340, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Chauvin v. SOUTHERN TECHNOLOGY & SERVICE 888 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    [1] Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
  • King v. Parish National Bank 885 So. 2d 540 La. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 7-8 n. 1 (La.3/4/98), , 380 n. 1.
  • Harrell v. Meristar Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 884 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 10 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Williams v. Mark Johnson Plumbing 882 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Jones v. Gilbert Southern Corp. 881 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, p. 13 (La.3/4/98), ; Hookfin v. Advantage Nursing Services, Inc., 03-340, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Royals v. Town of Richwood 880 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag and Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Walter Banks v. Blocker Co. 877 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 1997-1225 (La.03/04/98), .
  • Murray v. Hollywood Casino 877 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag and Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Rochelle 877 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    In Chaisson v. Cajun Bag and Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), , the court did consider the use of hearsay in worker’s compensation proceedings which also have the relaxed evidentiary standard under Article 1101(B).
  • Ronald L. Hanks v. Kinetics Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Hanks v. Kinetics Group, Inc. 878 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Singleton v. State Department of Public Safety & Corrections ex rel. Elayn Hunt Correctional Center 878 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    On this basis, the trial court found, per its adopted commissioner’s report, that “[c]learly, the dearth of evidence in this case renders the Department’s decision to uphold the guilty verdict manifestly erroneous and arbitrary.” In Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Co., 97-1225, pp. 12-13 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that for hearsay evidence to *557 qualify as “competent evidence” in administrative hearings, the evidence must have “some degree of reliability and trustw
  • Hooker v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 867 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag and Supply Co., 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Jones v. Walpole Tire Service, Inc. 867 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Chaisson v. Cajun Bag & Supply Company, 97-1225 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Tammy Spell v. Baker Foundation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3/4/98), : 3 LSA-RS 23:1317 mandates that the hearing office’s factual findings be based on “competent evidence.” This legislative mandate is necessary because under the express language of LSA-RS 23:1317, worker’s compensation hearing office