Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kimball v. Allstate Ins. Co., 712 So. 2d 46.
-
Kathleen Welch and Carroll Dewayne Welch v. United Medical Healthwest-New Orleans L.L.C. and United Medical Healthcare Inc.
La. 2025
4/14/98), Deer Enterprises, LLC v. Parish Counsil of Washington Parish, 10-0671 (La.
- Kathleen Welch and Carroll Dewayne Welch Versus United Medical Healthwest-New Orleans, L.L.C. and United Medical Healthcare Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
-
Town of Homer v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
137 So. 3d 811
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
|5 Co., 97-2885 (La.4/14/98), , “the constitution does not give us much guidance as to the meaning of the terms ‘local’ and ‘special.’ ” Thus, the courts have looked to jurisprudence and legal commentary to define local, special and general laws.
-
Louisiana High School Athletics Ass'n v. State
107 So. 3d 583
La. 2013
Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
-
Deer Enterprises, LLC v. Parish Council of Washington Parish
56 So. 3d 936
La. 2011
Co., 97-2885 (La.4/14/98); (citing Lee Hargrave, “Statutory" and “Hortatory” Provisions of the Louisiana Constitution of 1971, 43 La.
-
Fontenot v. PATTERSON INS.
997 So. 2d 529
La. 2008
97-2885, p. 19 (La.4/14/98), (emphasis added).
- Hon. Wilford D. Carter v. H. Lynn Jones, II, Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
Carter v. Jones
967 So. 2d 615
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., 97-2885, 97-2956, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
-
Beauclaire v. Greenhouse
922 So. 2d 501
La. 2006
In Kimball v. Allstate Insurance Company, 97-2885 (La.4/14/98), , this court addressed the constitutionality of two sections of LSA-R.S.
-
State v. Washington
900 So. 2d 1072
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 4/3/01), ; Kimball v. Allstate Ins., Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
-
State v. Washington
900 So. 2d 1072
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 4/3/01), ; Kimball v. Allstate Ins., Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
-
WTC TAXING DIST. v. All Taxpayers
894 So. 2d 1185
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Co., 97-2885, 97-2956, p. 6 (La.4/14/98), , 52: [A] law will be considered local or special, and therefore subject to the requirements of La.
-
World Trade Center Taxing District v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners, & Citizens of World Trade Center Taxing District …
894 So. 2d 1185
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Co., 97-2885, 97-2956, p. 6 (La.4/14/98), , 52: [A] law will be considered local or special, and therefore subject to the requirements of La.
-
State v. Rhea
876 So. 2d 131
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/3/01), ; Kimball v. Allstate Ins., Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
-
State v. Williams
866 So. 2d 296
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/3/01), ; Kimball v. Allstate Ins., Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
-
State v. Dilosa
848 So. 2d 546
La. 2003
Kimball v. Allstate Insurance Co., 97-2885, 97-2956 (La.4/14/98), .
-
Holmes v. Peoples State Bank
796 So. 2d 176
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Co., 97-2885 (La.4/14/98), .
-
In re Trestman
795 So. 2d 398
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Co., 97-2885, 97-2956, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), , 51 the Louisiana Supreme Court opined that “a statute is special if it affects only a certain number of persons within a class and not all persons possessing the characteristics of the class ...
-
Dauzat v. East Baton Rouge Parish Metropolitan Council
785 So. 2d 812
La. 2001
13:5105(0 unconstitutional in Kimball v. Allstate Insurance Co., 97-2885 (La.4/14/98), .
-
State v. Temple
789 So. 2d 639
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Co, 97-2885, 97-2956 (La.4/14/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, in discussing the 1974 Louisiana Constitution's prohibition against local and special laws set forth in Article III, Sections 12 and 13, stated: ["A] law may be a general law even though limited to one locality if it is general in its terms and its coverage can extend to other areas shou
-
Morial v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
785 So. 2d 1
La. 2001
Co., 97-2885, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), (quoting H. Alston Johnson III, Legislative Process, 36 La.
-
State v. Brazley
773 So. 2d 718
La. 2000
Co., 97-2885, 97-2956, p. 4 (La.4/14/98), .
-
Littleton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
747 So. 2d 701
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co., 97-2885, 97-2956 (La.4/14/98); , the supreme court stated that "the right to a jury trial in a civil case is not fundamental" and that the legislature can provide limitations upon one's ability to obtain a jury trial provided the limiting law does not violate any constitutional provision.
- Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
-
Tate v. Bossier Parish Policy Jury
727 So. 2d 679
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Kimball v. Allstate Insurance Company, 97-2885 (La.4/14/98), .
-
Buckley v. Sprull
712 So. 2d 499
La. 1998
Co., 97-2885 c/w 97-2956 (La.4/14/98), , the judgment of the district court declaring La.