Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lejano v. Bandak, 705 So. 2d 158.

49 citing documents.

Akili Johari Senior v. Overlog Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Universal Services and Associates, LLC v. Wade Grundmeyer, Val Coerver, Tauber Oil Company, Tauber Petrochemical Co., Chad Verhoff … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Rajesh Ramchandra Chauhan Versus Southern Pacific Holding Corp. and Kumiai Senpaku Co Ltd La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
12/12/97), discussed the importance of quasi in rem jurisdiction in maritime actions, stating: Admiralty, however, still has a legitimate need for limited forms of jurisdiction such as in rem and quasi in rem.
Creekstone Juban I, L.L.C. v. Xl Insurance America, Inc. La. 2019
Patricia Bell v. Carencro Nursing Home, Inc. D/B/A Evangeline Oaks Guest House La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Ron Warren, Ind. & O/B/O Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 196 So. 3d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“On 170matters of procedure, however, the state court is generally free to follow the state’s own rules.” Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388, p. 7 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Brandi Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Health System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
This doctrine provides that “an appellate court will not reconsider its own rulings of law in the same case.” Lejano v. Bandak, 97–388, p. 23 (La.12/12/97), cert.
Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority 189 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
This doctrine provides that “an appellate court will not reconsider its own rulings of law in the same case.” Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388, p. 23 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Herrera v. Beatrice Gallegos & Usagencies Casualty Insurance 178 So. 3d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388, p. 23 (La.12/12/97); .
Lois J. Shailow v. Gulf Coast Social Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Shailow v. Gulf Coast Social Services 166 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
This doctrine provides that “an appellate court will not reconsider its own rulings of law in the same case.” Lejano *1246 v. Bandak, 97-388, p. 23 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Louisiana Pigment Company, Lp v. Air Liquide America Corp., Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Louisiana Pigment Co. v. Air Liquide America, L.P. 149 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
This court in Thompson further acknowledged that the Louisiana Supreme *1001 Court pronounced forum selection clauses enforceable in Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
State ex rel. Division of Administration, Office of Risk Management v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Louisiana 146 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Fidelak v. Holmes European Motors, L.L.C. 130 So. 3d 851 La. 2013
97-388 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Lewis v. Townsend 108 So. 3d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Duncan v. Bartholomew 88 So. 3d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), .
Judson v. Davis 81 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Thompson Tree & Spraying Service, Inc. D/B/A Live Oak Landscapes v. White-Spunner Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Thompson Tree & Spraying Service, Inc. v. White-Spunner Construction, Inc. 68 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
First Bank and Trust v. Duwell 70 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
See Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), .
State ex rel. Division of Administration, Office of Risk Management v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. 56 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388, p. 23 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 36 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), .
Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc. 983 So. 2d 84 La. 2008
12/12/97), -63 ( citing Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. Tallentire, 477 U.S. 207, 222-23 , 106 S.Ct.
Moore v. Kenilworth/Kailas Properties 978 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388, p. 23 (La.12/12/97); .
Vallejo Enter. v. Boulder Image 950 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4th Cir.3/31/04), , 1220 and Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388, pp. 23-4 (La.12/12/97), -71 , cert.
Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANA 944 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), -66 , cert.
Power Marketing Direct, Inc. v. Foster 938 So. 2d 662 La. 2006
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), .
Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Board 938 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Lejano v. Bandak, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/12/97), .
Veal v. AMERICAN MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 923 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp. 908 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
[6] Our research reveals this Court has mentioned, but has not discussed or addressed, the "contract of adhesion" doctrine in the following cases: Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (Watson, J., dissenting in part and concurring in part); (Watson, J., dissenting); Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), (on rehearing)(Calogero, C.J., Lemmon, and Kimball, JJ., dissenting from the denial of the Application for Rehearing).
Soares v. Tidewater, Inc. 895 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
It is also analogous to the remedy contained in the lower court judgment which was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), .
Luffey v. FREDERICKSBURG PROPERTIES OF TX 862 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Finally, we further note that, in Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Bertucci v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 851 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388, p. 24 (La.12/12/97), .
Bonilla v. COMMODORE CURISE LINES LTD. 844 So. 2d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), .
Landry v. Blaise, Inc. 829 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388, p. 23 (La.12/12/97); .
Sawicki v. K/S STAVANGER PRINCE 802 So. 2d 598 La. 2001
Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), .
Keramidas v. Profile Shipping Ltd. 785 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
They further argue that on remand in Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), , the district court found that R.S.
Tulane Indus. Laundry, Inc. v. Quality Lube & Oil, Inc. 779 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), , cert den.
Sawicki v. K/S STAVANGER PRINCE 778 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Mr. Sawicki appeals, contending that (1) the trial court erred in granting a motion for summary judgment filed after the commencement of trial, (2) the trial court erred in enforcing the forum selection clause, and (3) (La.
Alexander v. Austin 771 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-388 (La.12/12/97); ; Edwards v. Daugherty, 97-1542 (La.App.
Gravois v. Delta Airlines, Inc. 797 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
art. 966; Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388, pp. 24-25 (La.12/12/97), , cert.
Rapp v. City of New Orleans 750 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), .
NORTHWEST LA PRODUCTION CREDIT v. State 746 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
art. 966; Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388, pp. 24-25 (La.12/12/97), .
Lysogorov v. Novorosyisk Shipping Co. 722 So. 2d 1030 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
We find the case of Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), to be dispositive of the issues raised.
Abuan v. Smedvig Tankships, Ltd. 717 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), , to this case.
Sanchez v. Commodore Cruise Lines, Ltd. 713 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In Lejano v. Bandak, 97-0388, (La.12/12/97), , the Supreme Court held that a forum selection clause should be enforced absent a clear showing that enforcement would be unreasonable and unjust, or that the clause is invalid for such reasons as fraud or overreaching, citing M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 , 92 S.Ct.
Chase v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming, Partnership 709 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Bandak, 97-0388 (La.12/12/97), ; (La.App.