Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Adams v. JE Merit Const., Inc., 712 So. 2d 88.

19 citing documents.

Thomas v. A. Wilbert & Sons, LLC 217 So. 3d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
*397 5/19/98), ” 50 We note that, in Adams , the supreme court found an employee was not entitled to recover punitive damages from his employer under article-2315.3 because the exclusivity provision in the workers’ compensation law prohibits an employee from recovering in tort.
Dwayne Chauvin v. Exxon Mobil Corporation 158 So. 3d 761 La. 2014
Thomas v. A. Wilbert & Sons, Inc. 98 So. 3d 879 La. 2012
Merit Construction, Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .
Bonnie Romero v. Clarendon America Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Merit Constr., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), ]
Romero v. CLARENDON AMERICA INS. CO. 54 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Merit Constr., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .]
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 922 So. 2d 1113 La. 2006
Merit Const., Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .
Deshotel v. Guichard Operating Co., Inc. 916 So. 2d 72 La. 2004
Merit Const., Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98) , acknowledging the express intent of the legislature in amending Section 1032 was to preclude employees from recovering punitive damages in tort.
In Re Harvey Term Litigation 872 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Merit Cons., Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .
Corbello v. Iowa Production 850 So. 2d 686 La. 2003
Merit Construction, Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), (found employee not entitled to recover punitive damages from his employer under 2315.3 because the first phrase of article 2315.3 providing that "in addition to general and special damages, punitive damages may be awarded...," implies that punitive damages are only available to those persons who are eligible to recov
Mosing v. Domas 830 So. 2d 967 La. 2002
Merit Const., Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .
Ross v. Conoco, Inc. 828 So. 2d 546 La. 2002
Merit Constr., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .
Young v. City of Plaquemine 818 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Merit Construction, Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .
Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 798 So. 2d 93 La. 2001
Merit Construction, Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .
Keller v. Evans Cooperage, Inc. 771 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Merit Const., Inc., 97-2005, (La.5/19/98) .
Washington v. Falco S & D, Inc. 762 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Merit Construction, Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), , is controlling under these circumstances.
Labbe v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. 756 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Merit Construction, Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98); .
Abney v. Exxon Corp. 755 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Merit Construction, Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), ; and whether the evidence concerning the toxicity or concentrations of substances is sufficient to fall within the ambit of former Article 2315.3.
Gussoni v. Tanner Industries, Inc. 725 So. 2d 5 La. 1998
Merit Construction, Inc., 97-2005 (La.5/19/98), .
Dominick v. Fisher 721 So. 2d 899 La. 1998
Merit Construction, Inc., et al 97-CC-2005 (La.5/19/98), .