DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Huntley, 708 So. 2d 1048.

146 citing documents.

  • State v. Sam 988 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Huntley, 97-965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Seltzer 986 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Huntley 986 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    [5] State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Taylor 966 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Smith 947 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Huntley, 97-965 (La.3/13/98), , citation omitted.
  • State v. Kelly 946 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) (to justify investigatory stop police must articulate something more than an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), (the level of suspicion for an investigatory stop need not rise to the probable cause required for a lawful arrest); State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (in making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police must have a particularized and objective basis for
  • State v. Caples 938 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    See State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), (per curiam).
  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Leday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98)
  • State v. Leday 930 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Clay 930 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    In determining whether an investigatory stop was justified by reasonable suspicion, a reviewing court must consider the totality of the circumstances, "giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained police officer `that might well elude an untrained person.'" State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), (per curiam), quoting Cortez, 449 U.S. at 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Atkins 926 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Stanfield 925 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    [9] State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Martin, 99-123 (La.App.
  • State v. Burciaga 924 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    In determining whether an investigatory stop was justified by reasonable suspicion, a reviewing court must consider the totality of the circumstances, "giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained police officer `that might well elude an untrained person.'" State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), (per curiam), quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. at 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Young 938 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    [18] State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bessie 917 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    In evaluating whether an officer had the requisite reasonable suspicion for a Terry stop, a "reviewing court must take into account the `totality of the circumstances-whole picture,' giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained police officer `that might well elude an untrained person.'" State v. Huntley, 97-965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Collins 890 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 4 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. London, 01-1016, p. 5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Tremane Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Huntley, 97- 0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98)
  • State v. Frank 883 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Quinn 885 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Mitchell 877 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Martin, 99-123 (La.App.
  • State v. Martinez 874 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Kang 866 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [7] State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), , quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bradley 867 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)); see also State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 1 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Massey 866 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [6] State v. Huntley, 97-965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Enclade 858 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Temple 854 So. 2d 856 La. 2003
    690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)); see also State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 1 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Sims 851 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Bolton 844 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [10] State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Duckett, 99-314 (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 841 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    [9] State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 2 (La.3/13/98), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Duquestrada 833 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Duckett, 99-314 (La.App.
  • State v. Parfait 831 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Lewis 828 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 3/15/00), , quoting State v. Huntley, 97-0865, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Sims 823 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Dupleche 823 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Temple 821 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    reasonable grounds to make an investigatory stop, “[a] reviewing court must take into account the ‘totality of the circumstances — the .whole picture,’ giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained police officer ‘that might well elude an untrained person.’ ” State v. Wilson, 00-0178 (La.12/8/00) (per curiam), , citing State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Huntley, 97-096 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Hughes 821 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Martin, 99-123 (La.App.
  • State v. Hill 821 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [7] State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 2 (La.3/13/98), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Huntley, 97-096 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Gagnon 817 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Newman 815 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Manson, 791 So.2d at 755-756 .
  • State v. London 815 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
  • State v. Butler 812 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [5] State v. Huntley, 97-965, p. 2 (La.3/13/98), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brooks 807 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Duckett, 99-314 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 804 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quotin
  • State v. Liles 803 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), , quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • State v. Vingle 802 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    This Court has emphasized that in assessing whether the police had reasonable grounds to make an investigatory stop, "[a] reviewing court must take into account the `totality of the circumstances—the whole picture,' giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained police officer `that might well elude an untrained person.'" State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), (La.
  • State v. Flagg 792 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .