Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Huntley, 708 So. 2d 1048.

146 citing documents.

State v. Allen 792 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 3/15/00), was quoting State v. Huntley, 97-0965 p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Bradley 791 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Manson 791 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Givens 785 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98)
State v. Camese 786 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
See: State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Martin, 99-123 (La.App.
State v. Haywood 783 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Morgan 783 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
In evaluating whether an officer had the requisite reasonable suspicion for a Terry stop, a "reviewing court must take into account the `totality of the circumstances whole picture,' giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained police officer `that might well elude an untrained person.'" State v. Huntley, 97-965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Waters 780 So. 2d 1053 La. 2001
State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), (quoting United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct.
State v. Burke 782 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Richardson 780 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Sylvester 781 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Boson 778 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
[2] 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Campbell 778 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Wilson 775 So. 2d 1051 La. 2000
This Court has emphasized that in assessing whether the police had reasonable grounds to make an investigatory stop, "[a] reviewing court must take into account the `totality of the circumstancesthe whole picture,' giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained police officer `that might well elude an untrained person.'" State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Phillips 774 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Hamilton 770 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Young 770 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Because the experienced policemen interpreted this statement as a guilty attempt to divert their attention, the State asserts that there was a reasonable basis for an investigatory stop under the totality of the circumstances, as in State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Davis 768 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Huntley, 97-965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that: “A reviewing court must take into ac *747 count the ‘totality of the circumstances — the whole picture,’ giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained officer that might well elude an untrained person....
State v. Hughes 765 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Watson 763 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Flagg 760 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Huntley, 97-965 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Duckett, 99-314 (La.App.
State v. Patterson 758 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quotin
State v. Wilson 758 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v.Huntley, 97-0865, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v.Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97); (quoting
State v. Williams 762 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *51 In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (
State v. McGee 752 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ ” State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quot
State v. Tyler 749 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quotin
State v. Brumfield 745 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 2-3 (La.3/13/98), , citing State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), , 881 and United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Oliver 752 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *915 "In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (
State v. Littles 742 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
See State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/31/98), .
State v. Harris 744 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quotin
State v. Hill 743 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police “ ‘must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’” State v. Katie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quoti
State v. Duckett 740 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Huntley, 97-965 (La.3/13/98), , quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 418 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Martin 738 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98), ; State v. Barney, 97-777, p. 4 (La.App.
State v. Cook 733 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that: "A reviewing court must take into account the `totality of the circumstancesthe whole picture,' giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained officer that might well elude an untrained person....
State v. Poche 733 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quotin
State v. Dappemont 734 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In making a brief investigatory stop on less than probable cause to arrest, the police "`must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.'" State v. Kalie, 96-2650, p. 3 (La.9/19/97), (quotin
State v. Martin 730 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
690, 695 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .
State v. Ash 729 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson 728 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Huntley, 97-0965, pp. 2-3 (La.3/13/98); , 1409 quoting United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct.
State v. Sheehan 740 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
In State v. Huntley, 97-0965, p. 3 (La.3/13/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that: "A reviewing court must take into account the `totality of the circumstancesthe whole picture,' giving deference to the inferences and deductions of a trained officer that might well elude an untrained person....
State v. Bargeman 721 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98); .
State v. Neal 719 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
The case cited by the State at the hearing in its opposition filed in the trial court, State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), , is not applicable to this case.
State v. Branch 714 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Huntley, 97-0965 (La.3/13/98), .