DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Soraparu, 703 So. 2d 608.

111 citing documents.

  • State v. Tate 33 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In reviewing the issue of excessive sentence on appeal, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), (per curiam) (Internal quotations in original, citations omitted).
  • State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    App. 4 Cir. 2/5/97), , reversed 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), ; and State v. Coleman, 94-0666 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), (Internal quotations in original, citations omitted).
  • State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State v. Dunbar 981 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (
  • State v. Allen 954 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Lemon 951 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State v. Robert 931 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), ; State v. Bajoie, 2004-1843 (La.
  • State v. Williams 932 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Additionally, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphrey, 445 S
  • State v. Bajoie 899 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Bertrand 891 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humph
  • State v. Landry 871 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Taves 861 So. 2d 144 La. 2003
    State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), ; see also State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State v. Lebreton 859 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027, p. 1 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: ...
  • State v. Augillard 853 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humph
  • State v. Simmons 848 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence *68 might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Hum
  • State v. Farhood 844 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State v. Smith 842 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: ItiOn appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ “whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Hu
  • State v. Foster 834 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Jefferson 834 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphrey
  • State v. Breaux 830 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State v. Coleman 828 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, held: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’” For legal sentences imposed within the range provided by the legislature, a trial court
  • State v. Cottrell 817 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad | ¿sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Hu
  • State v. Barnes 816 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Moreover, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Spot 812 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, held: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” For legal sentences imposed within the range provided by the legislature, a trial cour
  • State v. McBride 807 So. 2d 836 La. 2002
    See State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might liflhave been more appropriate.’” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Hu
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" *308 State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Hu
  • State v. McCraney 798 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
  • State v. Coston 800 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humph
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence | ?,?might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Camese 791 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    However, in State v. Soraparu, 97-1027, p. 1 (La.1997), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" *177 State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Hu
  • State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humph
  • State v. Harris 787 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humph
  • State v. Points 787 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” [Citations omitted].
  • State v. Boudreaux 782 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Const. art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes `punishment disproportionate to the offense.'" State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), () (emphasis added).
  • State v. Robichaux 788 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Algere 780 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: |7On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’” State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Hump
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: *649 On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Hu
  • State v. Williams 778 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See also State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , in which the Louisiana Supreme Court reimposed the trial court’s forty-year manslaughter sentence on a youthful defendant, holding that the sentencing court’s finding that the offense was a “cold and deliberate act” which would have justified a verdict of second degree murder adequately supported the sentence impose
  • State v. Barrois 778 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’” [Cites omitted].
  • State v. Jones 779 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court, held: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.’ ” For legal sentences imposed within the range provided by the legislature, a trial cour
  • State v. Williams 776 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reimposed the trial court's forty-year manslaughter sentence on a youthful defendant; in that opinion the Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence mig
  • State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (
  • State v. Hall 775 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Guy 775 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre