Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Soraparu, 703 So. 2d 608.

111 citing documents.

State v. Dank 764 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
State v. Gibson 761 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97)
State v. Monette 758 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), (quoting State v. Humphre
State v. Black 757 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
See State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
State v. Rodriguez 753 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
App. 4 Cir. 9/8/99), .9 In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court cited State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96), , 959 and held: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.'" Defendant was co
State v. Sarkozy 755 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), .
State v. Myers 753 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97); (citations omitted; alteration in original), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In cases in which the trial court has left a less than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentencing is appr
State v. Ross 743 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reimposed the trial court's forty-year manslaughter sentence on a youthful defendant; in that opinion the Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is "`whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence mig
State v. Stark 736 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), , the Louisiana Supreme Court re-imposed the trial court’s forty-year manslaughter sentence on a youthful defendant; in that opinion the Supreme Court stated: On appellate review of sentence, the only relevant question is “ ‘ whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion, not whether another sentence
State v. Underwood 724 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
In State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97); , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: In cases in which the trial court has left a less than fully articulated record indicating that it has considered not only aggravating circumstances but also factors militating for a less severe sentence, a remand for resentencing is appropriate only when “there appear[s] to be a
State v. Thomas 719 So. 2d 49 La. 1998
Const. art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes `punishment disproportionate to the offense."' State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), () (emphasis added).