Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anderson, 707 So. 2d 1223.

70 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Deangelo Whitaker La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
2/6/98), State v. Frost, 53,312 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Sidney Bradley Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Antonio Dante Key La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of D.W. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cyprian La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
2/ 6/ 98), ( per curiam) ( uq oting 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.7, p. 138 ( West 1996)); State v. Clay, 2011- 1974 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Millennium Health Care Services, L.L.C., d/b/a Millennium PCA Services La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
2/ 6/ 98), ( per curiam) ( quoting 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.
State Of Louisiana v. Dynetta Hadrick Woods La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
2/ 6/ 98), ( per curiam) ( ting 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Monteco K. Frost La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
2/6/98), State v. Jones, 49,830 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brent M. Braneon Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Patrick James Kraemer La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2/ 6/ 98), ( per curiam) quoting 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, CI Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.
State v. Williams 266 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Williams 262 So. 3d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Lewis 256 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2/6/98), ; State v. Jones , 49,830 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee 223 So. 3d 1136 La. 2017
2/6/98), (quoting 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.7, p. 138 (West 1996) (“It is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice’s inte
State v. Dyson 222 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Green 211 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Tedrick Jewan Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam) (quotation omitted).
State v. Richardson 210 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam) (quotation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Chadwick McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
2/6/98), State v. Mason, 10-284 (La.App.
State v. McGhee 179 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 4/3/13) , ; State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), ; State v. Mason, 10-284 (La.App.
State v. Jones 166 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Anderson, 1997-1301 (La.02/06/98), .
State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice’s intention.’ ” State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), ; See also State v. Pleasant, 11-1675 (La.App.
State v. Johnson 151 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 1 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Brooks 139 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Ronald G. Acker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam) (quotation omitted).
State v. Acker 111 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam) (quotation omitted).
State v. Gross 110 So. 3d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
However, “[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice’s intention.” State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), ; State v. Page, 08-531 (La.App.
State v. Mason 109 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), ; State v. Hampton, 46,363 (La.App.2d Cir.5/18/11), , writ denied, 2011-1467 (La.2/3/12), .
State v. Pleasant 102 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Although factors that can contribute to the finding that a defendant is a principal include “ ‘standing by the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice’s intention.’ ” State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (quoting from 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.7, p. 138 (West 1996)).
State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See also State v. Anderson, 97-301,14 p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per cu-riam).
State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/10/09), , writ denied, 09-2684 (La.6/4/10), (citing, State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam)).
State v. Lewis 74 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.02/06/98), .
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See also State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam).
State v. Hampton 69 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Anderson, 1997-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Wiley 68 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
However, “[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice’s | n intention.” State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam).
State v. Wright 61 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 11/10/09), , writ denied, 09-2684 (La.6/4/10), , citing, State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam).
State v. Mason 59 So. 3d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Anderson, 97-1801, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam) (quotation omitted).
State v. Page 28 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
However, “[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice’s intention.” State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam), quoting 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.7, p. 138 (West 1996).
State, in the Interest of Kjc 17 So. 3d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Smith 13 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
However, “ ‘it is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice’s intention.’ ” State v. Kirkland, supra at 269, quoting State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State in the Interest of D.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State ex rel. D.J. 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
However, “‘it is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice’s intention.’ ” State v. Kirkland, supra at 269 , quoting State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State Ex Rel. Dj 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
However, "`it is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'" State v. Kirkland, supra at 269 , quoting State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Arceneaux 983 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
But "`[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'" State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam) (quoting 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.7, p. 138 (West 1996).
State v. McFarland 960 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
See, State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. King 951 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
It is, nonetheless, "`sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'" State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
State v. Anderson, 97-1301, p. 3 (La.2/6/98), ("Acting in concert, each man then became responsible not only for his own acts but for the acts of the other.").
State v. Arceneaux 930 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
However, "`[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'" State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), (per curiam) (quoting 2 W. LaFave, A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 6.7, p. 138 (West 1996)).
State v. Weaver 917 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
However, "`[i]t is sufficient encouragement that the accomplice is standing by at the scene of the crime ready to give some aid if needed, although in such a case it is necessary that the principal actually be aware of the accomplice's intention.'" State v. Anderson, 97-1301 (La.2/6/98), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by