State v. Narcisse
State v. Narcisse, 714 So. 2d 698 (La. 1998).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. Exzavian Burnette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana v. James Sanford Snider La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Kendarius Dewayne Sewell A/K/A Kendarius Sewell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana v. David Paul Monceaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana v. Phillip Jarratt La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Dalton Bryce Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana v. Randall Paul Burton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- State of Louisiana v. John Drummer, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- State v. Drummer 245 So. 3d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State of Louisiana v. James Toups La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Clark 643 So. 2d 463
- State v. Johnson 649 So. 2d 418
- State v. Matthews 572 So. 2d 250
- State v. Matthews 575 So. 2d 387
- State v. Wiggins 666 So. 2d 661
Opinion text
714 So.2d 698 (1998) STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond NARCISSE. No. 97-K-3161. Supreme Court of Louisiana. June 26, 1998. *699 PER CURIAM. [*] Granted. Relator's sentence is vacated and this case is remanded to the district court for resentencing. A trial court may not require restitution to the victim "unless the imposition or execution of sentencing is suspended." State v. Clark, 93-1470 (La.App. 3 Cir.1994), 643 So.2d 463, 467 , writ denied, 94-2715 (La.2/9/95), 649 So.2d 418 ; State v. Matthews, 572 So.2d 250, 254 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1990), writ denied, 575 So.2d 387 (La.1991). In addition, a trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S. 15:573.1(C) to deny a defendant eligibility for good time credits against his sentence, because that statute is "directed to the Department of Corrections exclusively." State ex rel. Simmons v. Stalder, 93-1852 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 661 . Moreover, even the Department of Corrections lacks that authority under La.R.S. 15:571.3(C) in a case in which the trial court has not formally adjudicated and sentenced the defendant as a multiple offender under the provisions of La. R.S. 15:529.1. When the sentencing court is of the opinion that a denial of diminution of sentence is warranted under the specific circumstances of the case, the trial judge's discretion should be exercised under La.C.Cr.P. 890.1(B). NOTES [*] Victory, J., not on panel. Rule IV, part 2, § 3.