Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Narcisse, 714 So. 2d 698.

64 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Exzavian Burnette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. James Sanford Snider La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Kendarius Dewayne Sewell A/K/A Kendarius Sewell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. David Paul Monceaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Phillip Jarratt La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Dalton Bryce Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 10/13/99), this court stated that correction of an illegal sentence does not typically require remand but also found: We note that in State v. Narcisse, 97–3161 (La.6/26/98); the supreme court vacated a sentence and remanded to the trial court for resentencing where the trial court erroneously required restitution and denied the defendant eligibility for good-time credits.
State of Louisiana v. Randall Paul Burton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. John Drummer, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Drummer 245 So. 3d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. James Toups La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
6/26/98), State v. Fallon, 15- 1116 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Stephon Enrique Fallon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Fallon 189 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
15:571.3(0 to deny a defendant eligibility for good time credits against his sentence, because that statute is ‘directed to the Department of Corrections exclusively,’ ” State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Margaret Ann Howard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98)
State v. Armstrong 47 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See State v. Smith, 2000-1681 (La.2/2/01), ; State v. Narcisse, 97-3161 (La.6/26/98), ; State v. Bra-ziel, 42,668 (La.App.2d Cir.10/24/07), .
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy Joe Chandler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/98), the court held in pertinent part: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State v. Chandler 36 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
| ^Further, in State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98), , the court held in pertinent part: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Lee Tate, Jr. AKA Samuel L. Tate, Jr. AKA Sam L. Tate AKA … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/98), the court held, as follows: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State v. Tate 32 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Narcisse, 97-3161 (La.6/26/98), , the court held, as follows: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.
State of Louisiana v. Clayton James Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/26/98), the supreme court stated the following regarding a trial court’s authority to deny eligibility for diminution of sentence: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Ricky N. Nolen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/26/98), the court held in pertinent part:2 [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Toby R. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/26/98), the court held in pertinent part:1 [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Bruce D. Dial La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/26/98), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State v. James 26 So. 3d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98), , the court held in pertinent part: 1 [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.
State v. Dial 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/26/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State v. Nolen 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/26/98), , the court held in pertinent part: [2] [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State v. GRIFFINS 25 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/26/98), , our supreme court held, in pertinent part: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Griffins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/26/98), our supreme court held, in pertinent part: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Elijah Lamar Mincey AKA - Robert Bryant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/26/98), citing State ex rel.
State v. Mincey 12 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
15:571.3(C) to deny a defendant eligibility for good time credits against his sentence, because that statute is “directed to the Department of Corrections exclusively.” State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98), , citing State ex rel.
State v. HLJ 6 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Narcisse, 97-3161 (La.6/26/98), .
State of Louisiana v. H.L. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. H.L.J. 6 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Narcisse, 97-3161 (La.6/26/98), .
Young v. Tigner 5 So. 3d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
6/26/98), ; State ex rel.
State v. Decay 989 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Hebert v. State, 03-2474 (La.10/1/04), ; State v. Narcisse, 97-3161 (La.6/26/98), .
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Colton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Colton 968 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Narcisse, 97-3161 (La.6/26/98), .
State v. Braziel 968 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1st Cir.), writ denied, see also, State v. Jones, 2006-2905 (La.8/31/07), ; State v. Narcisse, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/26/98), .
State v. Jones 963 So. 2d 381 La. 2007
See State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98), (Department of Corrections lacks authority to deny diminution of sentence for good behavior on a sentence imposed for a crime enumerated in La.
State v. Jones 963 So. 2d 382 La. 2007
See State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98), (Department of Corrections lacks authority to deny diminution of sentence for good behavior on a sentence imposed for a crime enumerated in La.
State of Louisiana v. D.R.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/26/98), the supreme court stated the following regarding a trial court’s authority to deny eligibility for diminution of sentence: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Richard Ordner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/26/98), the 1 Later in the proceeding, after the judge had imposed the sentences, she was asked to clarify her reference to La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Ordner 951 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98), , the supreme court stated the following regarding a trial court's authority to deny eligibility for diminution of sentence: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
6/26/98), the supreme court stated the following regarding a trial court’s authority to deny eligibility for diminution of sentence: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State v. Hood 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
6/26/98), , the supreme court stated the following regarding a trial court's authority to deny eligibility for diminution of sentence: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Sammie Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
6/26/98), the supreme court stated the following regarding a trial court’s authority to deny eligibility for diminution of sentence: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State v. Davis 918 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In State v. Narcisse, 97-3161, p. 1 (La.6/26/98), , the supreme court stated the following regarding a trial court's authority to deny eligibility for diminution of sentence: [A] trial judge lacks authority under La.R.S.
State v. Sam 905 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Hebert v. State, 03-2474 (La.10/1/04), ; State v. Narcisse, 97-3161 (La.6/26/98), .
State of Louisiana v. John M. Benedict La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
6/26/98), citing State ex rel.