DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Egana, 703 So. 2d 223.

109 citing documents.

  • State v. Hurst 828 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Clark 828 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Jones 814 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 12/3/97) , -228 .
  • State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Moses 806 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Spencer 802 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Moore 797 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Allen 793 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Bloodworth 790 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Marino 804 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Knight 794 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Baudier 789 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Toups 792 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Walker 789 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 12/3/97), -228 , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of act could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Harris 787 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Morgan 779 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hodge 781 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Boudreaux 777 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 12/3/97), -228 ).
  • State v. Robinson 772 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. McZeal 779 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    App. 4 Cir. 12/3/97), -228 .
  • State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Pleasant 772 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Marshall 774 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 12/3/97), -228 ).
  • State v. Bullock 767 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Walker 764 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Dupart 769 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Monette 758 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Drummer 750 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Gipson 747 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 12/3/97), -28 , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of act could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Burton 746 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Long 744 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 12/3/97) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of act could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Robinson 744 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 12/3/97) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of act could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Ragas 744 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 12/3/97) , , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. McCormick 737 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 12/3/97), , 227-28: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.