Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Egana, 703 So. 2d 223.

109 citing documents.

State v. Guy 737 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 12/3/97), , 227-28: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of act could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Lewis 736 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 12/3/97), -28 , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Williams 735 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
4th Cir. 12/3/97), , However, proximity to the drug, or association with the possessor, may establish a prima facie case of possession when colored by other evidence.
State v. Brady 727 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
4 Cir. 12/3/97), -28 , as follows: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of act could have found the defendant *1268 guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Reyes 726 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. DeSilva 726 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
App. 4 Cir 12/3/97), -228 , this Court set forth the standard for an appellate review of the sufficiency of evidence to support a defendant’s conviction: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to
State v. Johnson 719 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
4 Cir 12/3/97), -228 , this court discussed an appellate court’s review for sufficiency of evidence: the reviewing court may not disregard [the dictates of Jackson v. Virginia] simply because the record contains evidence that tends to support each fact necessary to constitute the crime.
State v. Atkins 713 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
4 Cir. 12/3/97), , 227-8: In evaluating whether evidence is constitutionally sufficient to support a conviction, an appellate court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosection, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Campbell 715 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998