Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Frost, 727 So. 2d 417.

50 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. John Paul Simien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Barnes Derrick Groves La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Colby James Kinsey A/K/A Colby J. Kinsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Degregory 274 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Donasty Anwanique Cohen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Cohen 272 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Walls La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
lation and that a challenge should be granted, “even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), Maxie, 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535; -1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); -65 (La.1986)
State v. Walls 270 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
929 (La.1985) ; See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), , 423 ; Maxie , 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535 ; , 1389-1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); , 264-65 (La.1986) ; , 38 (La.1983).
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
and that a challenge should be granted, “even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97–1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), Maxie, 93–2158 at 16–17, 653 So.2d at 535; –1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); –65 (La.1986)
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
12/1/98), , 423 ; Maxie , 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535 ; , 1389-1390 (La.
State v. Harrison 239 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Payton 245 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Derrick A. Dotson La. 2017
State v. Mickelson 210 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
12/1/98), cert denied, 528 U.S. 831, 120 S.Ct.
State v. Wells 203 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
185 , 154 L.Ed.2d 73 (2002); State v. Frost, 1997-1771 p. 32 (La.12/1/98), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Asa Bentley AKA - Asa N. Bentley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Bentley 182 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Frost, 97-1771, pp. 18-19 (La.12/1/98), -33 , cert.
State of Louisiana v. David Caleb Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Fontenot 160 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Regarding inappropriate comments during closing arguments, in State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 19 (La.12/1/98), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State v. Edgar 140 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
185 , 154 L.Ed.2d 73 (2002); State v. Frost, 1997-1771 p. 32 (La.12/1/98), , cert.
State v. Garcia 108 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
g., armed robbery murders, murders during a rape or aggravated kidnapping, or during a home invasion, that, even assuming the pool of similar cases which did not result in death is also significant, the death penalty does not appear to reflect the “‘wanton and freakish infliction of capital punishment.’ ” Bordelon , 07-0525 at 45, (quoting State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 27 (La.12/1/98), ).
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
es cannot be considered in isolation and that a challenge should be granted, “even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror’s responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably [inferred].” See State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 4 (La.12/1/98), ; Maxie , 93-2158 at 16-17, 653 So.2d at 535 ; -1390 (La.1990) (per curiam); -65 (La.1986)
State of Louisiana v. Mary Henderson Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Trahan 69 So. 3d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Frost, 97-1771, pp. 18-19 (La.12/1/98), -33 , cert.
State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
Cf. State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 27 (La.12/1/98), (“[Ajlthough counsel argues correctly in his Sentence Review Memorandum that proportionality review should include all similar first-degree murder prosecutions including those which resulted in non-capital verdicts and/or sentences, the relevant pool of capital sentences based in part or entirely on armed robbery
State v. Warren 2 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
In State v. Frost, 1997-1771 (La.12/1/98), -33 , cert.
State v. Sudds 998 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
185 , 154 L.Ed.2d 73 (2002); State v. Frost, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/1/98), , cert.
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
99 , 142 L.Ed.2d 79 (1998) ("Although Ms. McAdams and Ms. Lewis were theoretical supporters of the death penalty, a full reading of the voir dire clearly indicates they could not have imposed the penalty in this case."); cf. State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), , cert.
State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
185 , 154 L.Ed.2d 73 (2002); State v. Frost, XXXX-XXXX p. 32 (La.12/1/98), , cert.
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Frost, 97-1771, pp. 3-4 (La.12/1/98), , quoting Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Willis 915 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 18-19 (La.12/1/98), -33 , cert.
State v. Mims 907 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
2d Cir. 2/28/01), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/22/02), ; State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), .
State v. Allen 913 So. 2d 788 La. 2005
State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 26 (La.1998), , cert.
State v. McKinnie 850 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
P. art. 703; State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), , U.S. cert.
State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
The amendment has unquestionably superceded this court's decisions in State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), and State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), , with regard to those persons entitled to provide testimony as to the impact "that the death of the victim has had" on their lives.
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
See State v. Williams, 96-1023 (La.1/21/98), (prospective jurors properly dismissed for cause because the age of the defendant would have impaired their ability to return a death verdict); State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), (same); (prospective jurors properly dismissed for cause because they could not impose death penalty on borderline retardate); see also State v. Deal, 00-0434 (La.11/28/01), , 2001 WL 1511864 (unpub'd appx.
State v. Jacobs 803 So. 2d 933 La. 2001
See, e.g., State v. Tilley, 99-0569 (La.7/6/00), (defendant killed a sixty-eight-year-old man by repeatedly stabbing him during the course of an armed robbery in the parking lot of a restaurant); State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), (defendant, a hotel employee, stabbed the night auditor to death and stole the contents of the cash box); State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/14/94), (defendant broke into the victims' home, armed himself with a kitchen knife, and stabbed the two elderly victims to de
State v. Oxley 802 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98); .
State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
article 841 applies to the guilt phase in capital cases); State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 3, n. 4 (La.12/1/98), (extending Taylor to voir dire errors defaulted by lack of objection).
State v. Lowery 781 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), .
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
The standard for excluding a potential juror from a capital case based on his opinions regarding capital punishment is whether those views would "`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and oath.'" State v. Frost, 97-1771, pp. 3-4 (La.12/1/98), , quoting Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412, 424 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 778 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
This issue was discussed in State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), , rehearing denied; cert.
State v. Gomez 778 So. 2d 549 La. 2001
Subsequent to the 1994 amendment, we had occasion to consider the scope of the amendment in State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), .
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
State v. Frost, 97-1771, p. 14 (La.12/1/98), , cert.
State v. Wessinger 736 So. 2d 162 La. 1999
State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.12/1/98), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.12/1/98), ___ So.2d ___.