Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.

796 citing documents.

  • State v. Melancon 826 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.
  • State v. Heard 823 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Goodley 820 So. 2d 478 La. 2002
    [8] Goodley, 00-0846, p. 7, n. 2 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 821 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, [97—1906 (La.3/4/98), ] supra at 675
  • State v. Nash 821 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Johnson 821 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Fontana 821 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    A trial court may, however, under State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , declare as excessive the statutory minimum sentences in exceptional cases.
  • State v. Taylor 821 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Everett 816 So. 2d 1272 La. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Cottrell 817 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Ventress 817 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law may still be constitutionally excessive.
  • State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Harbor 817 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Barnes, 01-489, p. 2 (La.App.
  • State v. Hicks 817 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Keeley 814 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Webster, 98-0807, p. 3 (La.App.
  • State v. Barnes 816 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. George 829 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Jefferson 815 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Sharp 810 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), , in the context of habitual offender sentencing, the supreme court stated: [T]o rebut the presumption that the mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional, the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that: [he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a
  • State v. Sewell 811 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, supra .
  • State v. Dillon 812 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; (La.
  • State v. Williams 811 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Barnes, 01-489, p. 2 (La.App.
  • State v. Knight 811 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Neal, 00-41 (La.App.
  • State v. Moore 809 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Daniel 811 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Parker 812 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [2] State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Johnson 812 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [21] [22] 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Webster 805 So. 2d 1178 La. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8, .
  • State v. Scott 823 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.App.2d Cir.4/4/01), .
  • State v. Lee 807 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Rice 807 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Bowen 806 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [18] State v. Lindsey, 770 So.2d at 343 , quoting State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), -677 .
  • State v. Mims 806 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Temple 806 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. West 801 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p.8 (La.3/4/98); at 676 , quoting, State v. Young, 94-1636, p. 5-6 (La.App.
  • State v. Wilson 803 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Davis 801 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), -677 ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Barnes 800 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. O'NEAL 795 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    The court noted that its effort to set forth guidelines to be used by the lower courts when deciding whether to exercise their discretion to declare minimum sentences excessive culminated in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Felder 809 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    App. 1 Cir. 6/23/00), (quoting State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), ), (quoting State v. Young, 94-1636, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
  • State v. Hansbro 796 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Moore 797 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Webster, 98-0807 (La.App.
  • State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Id., citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), and State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 796 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. English, 34,164 (La.App.2d Cir.12/20/00), .
  • State v. Kirkland 798 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Decay 798 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Finney 798 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).