Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.
-
State v. Alexander
753 So. 2d 933
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Rodriguez
753 So. 2d 339
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Milton
751 So. 2d 440
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
-
State v. Thompson
752 So. 2d 293
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Johnson
750 So. 2d 398
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
-
State v. Ruffins
748 So. 2d 614
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
2 Cir. 10/27/99) , , quoting State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
-
State v. Ruffins
748 So. 2d 614
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
2 Cir. 10/27/99) , , quoting State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
-
State v. Carthan
765 So. 2d 357
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 2-3 (La.3/4/98); .
-
State v. Gass
747 So. 2d 715
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Windham
748 So. 2d 1220
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
[7] State v. Dorthey ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Russell
750 So. 2d 1074
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Defendant relies upon the Louisiana Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , to suggest that a downward deviation from the minimum sentence was justified in this case.
-
State v. Fobbs
747 So. 2d 1232
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Nonetheless, I can find no difference in this matter and State v. Johnson, 96KK1263, except that in the Johnson case the imposed sentence was served in its entirety and the defendant was brought back to have the mandatory minimum imposed.
-
State v. Martello
748 So. 2d 1192
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.
-
State v. Copeland
750 So. 2d 224
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed this issue in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Owens
743 So. 2d 890
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
-
State v. Louis
744 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Carter
746 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Our supreme court stated in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), , 675-676: It is important to understand the roles both the Legislature and the judiciary have in sentencing persons for their criminal activity.
-
State v. Davis
745 So. 2d 136
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed a case in which the defendant, a fourth felony offender, was sentenced to thirty months at hard labor for possession of cocaine, despite the mandatory minimum of twenty years provided by the Habitual Offender Law.
-
State v. Warren
742 So. 2d 722
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
-
State v. Burton
746 So. 2d 74
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson , 97-1906 pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Taylor
743 So. 2d 749
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), at 676 .
-
State v. Hollins
742 So. 2d 671
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court further stated: A sentencing judge must always start with the presumption that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutional.
- State v. Long 744 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
-
State v. Thomas
747 So. 2d 610
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Ditcharo
739 So. 2d 957
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
In State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-9 (La.3/4/98), -677 , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether Dorthey permits a trial judge to deviate from the statutorily mandated sentences found in LSA-R.S.
-
State v. Hayes
739 So. 2d 301
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Therein, the Louisiana Supreme Court ordered that we reconsider our decision on assignment of error two, in light of State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); .
-
State v. Randall
741 So. 2d 852
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); , recently elaborated on what a defendant must demonstrate to successfully obtain a deviation from the mandatory sentences of La.R.S.
-
State v. Hannon
736 So. 2d 323
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Jones
733 So. 2d 127
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
-
State v. Johnson
747 So. 2d 61
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98)
-
State v. Finch
730 So. 2d 1020
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
-
State v. Bush
733 So. 2d 49
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Ash
729 So. 2d 664
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Jackson
726 So. 2d 1061
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Gass
728 So. 2d 896
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Hayes
729 So. 2d 584
La. 1998
Granted and remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration in light of State v. Johnson 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Medious
722 So. 2d 1086
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
In the recent cases of State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98) ; the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law may still be reviewed for constitutional excessiveness.
-
State v. Short
725 So. 2d 23
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Although the Louisiana Supreme Court has not specifically considered the constitutionality of the statute as amended, in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Court stated (post amendment): "Since the Habitual Offender Law in its entirety is constitutional, the minimum sentences it imposes upon multiple offenders are also presumed to be constitutional," State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App.
-
State v. Burns
723 So. 2d 1013
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State ex rel. A.A.S.
726 So. 2d 900
La. 1998
The decision of the court of appeal is vacated and this case is remanded to the juvenile court for reconsideration of its disposition in this case according to the criteria set forth in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Jackson
718 So. 2d 1001
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Our Supreme Court has ordered us to reconsider our opinion in light of its decision in State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , which, |3in essence, precludes a court from ever deviating from the sentences pronounced under the habitual offender statute.
-
State v. Taylor
720 So. 2d 1208
La. 1998
The matter is remanded to the trial judge for reconsideration in light of State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Jackson
714 So. 2d 679
La. 1998
Therefore, we remand this case to the *680 Fourth Circuit for reconsideration in light of the principles stated by this court in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State v. Francis
715 So. 2d 457
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
However, this is the type of excessive sentence the supreme court wrote about in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
-
State ex rel. A.A.S.
711 So. 2d 319
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
The Supreme Court has most recently reaffirmed these principles in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/3/98), .
-
State v. Johnson
709 So. 2d 679
La. 1998
[1] This case is consolidated with State of Louisiana v. Walter Johnson, (La.1998), .