Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.

796 citing documents.

  • State v. Alexander 753 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Rodriguez 753 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Milton 751 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Thompson 752 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Johnson 750 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    2 Cir. 10/27/99) , , quoting State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Ruffins 748 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    2 Cir. 10/27/99) , , quoting State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Carthan 765 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 2-3 (La.3/4/98); .
  • State v. Gass 747 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Windham 748 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    [7] State v. Dorthey ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Russell 750 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Defendant relies upon the Louisiana Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , to suggest that a downward deviation from the minimum sentence was justified in this case.
  • State v. Fobbs 747 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Nonetheless, I can find no difference in this matter and State v. Johnson, 96KK1263, except that in the Johnson case the imposed sentence was served in its entirety and the defendant was brought back to have the mandatory minimum imposed.
  • State v. Martello 748 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.
  • State v. Copeland 750 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed this issue in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Owens 743 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Louis 744 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Carter 746 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Our supreme court stated in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), , 675-676: It is important to understand the roles both the Legislature and the judiciary have in sentencing persons for their criminal activity.
  • State v. Davis 745 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed a case in which the defendant, a fourth felony offender, was sentenced to thirty months at hard labor for possession of cocaine, despite the mandatory minimum of twenty years provided by the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Warren 742 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Burton 746 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson , 97-1906 pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Taylor 743 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), at 676 .
  • State v. Hollins 742 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court further stated: A sentencing judge must always start with the presumption that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutional.
  • State v. Long 744 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Thomas 747 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Ditcharo 739 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-9 (La.3/4/98), -677 , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether Dorthey permits a trial judge to deviate from the statutorily mandated sentences found in LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Hayes 739 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Therein, the Louisiana Supreme Court ordered that we reconsider our decision on assignment of error two, in light of State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); .
  • State v. Randall 741 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); , recently elaborated on what a defendant must demonstrate to successfully obtain a deviation from the mandatory sentences of La.R.S.
  • State v. Hannon 736 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Jones 733 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Johnson 747 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98)
  • State v. Finch 730 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Bush 733 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Ash 729 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Jackson 726 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Gass 728 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Hayes 729 So. 2d 584 La. 1998
    Granted and remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration in light of State v. Johnson 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Medious 722 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    In the recent cases of State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98) ; the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law may still be reviewed for constitutional excessiveness.
  • State v. Short 725 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Although the Louisiana Supreme Court has not specifically considered the constitutionality of the statute as amended, in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Court stated (post amendment): "Since the Habitual Offender Law in its entirety is constitutional, the minimum sentences it imposes upon multiple offenders are also presumed to be constitutional," State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App.
  • State v. Burns 723 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State ex rel. A.A.S. 726 So. 2d 900 La. 1998
    The decision of the court of appeal is vacated and this case is remanded to the juvenile court for reconsideration of its disposition in this case according to the criteria set forth in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Jackson 718 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Our Supreme Court has ordered us to reconsider our opinion in light of its decision in State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , which, |3in essence, precludes a court from ever deviating from the sentences pronounced under the habitual offender statute.
  • State v. Taylor 720 So. 2d 1208 La. 1998
    The matter is remanded to the trial judge for reconsideration in light of State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Jackson 714 So. 2d 679 La. 1998
    Therefore, we remand this case to the *680 Fourth Circuit for reconsideration in light of the principles stated by this court in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Francis 715 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    However, this is the type of excessive sentence the supreme court wrote about in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State ex rel. A.A.S. 711 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    The Supreme Court has most recently reaffirmed these principles in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/3/98), .
  • State v. Johnson 709 So. 2d 679 La. 1998
    [1] This case is consolidated with State of Louisiana v. Walter Johnson, (La.1998), .