DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.

796 citing documents.

  • State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.1993).
  • State v. Scott 769 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    He argues his case was exceptional within the meaning of State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , and the circumstances of his case are similar to those presented in State v. Hayes, 97-1526 (La.App.
  • State v. Clark 774 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 769 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 6 (La.3/4/98), , permits a downward departure from the Habitual Offender Law's mandatory minimum sentences and concluded as follows: A sentencing judge must always start with the presumption that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habi
  • State v. Calhoun 776 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-8 (La.3/4/98); -77 (emphasis added), would permit a downward deviation from a statutorily-mandated sentence: In State v. Dorthey, supra, this Court held that a trial court must reduce a defendant's sentence to one not constituti
  • State v. Clem 779 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Davenport 771 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Walker 772 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Burton, 98-0096, pp. 6-7 (La.App.
  • State v. Baker 772 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Lindsey 770 So. 2d 339 La. 2000
    15:529.1, constitutes an excessive sentence under State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Hall 775 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Webster, 98-0807, p. 3 (La.App.
  • State v. Burnett 768 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Hunter 768 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Chisolm 771 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    [2] In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the non-violent nature of current or past crimes cannot alone rebut the presumption that the mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutional.
  • State v. Washington 769 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Washington 769 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Dunn 769 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Dillion 770 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Newman 769 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    However, in State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the court held that such a departure from the minimum sentence would be upheld only when a court could demonstrate that the defendant’s case and circumstances were exceptional.
  • State v. Breaux 767 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court further stated: A sentencing judge must always start with the presumption that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutional.
  • State v. Jones 765 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Stephenson 766 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Ponsell 766 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Bush, 31,710 (La.App.
  • State v. Guy 775 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Webster, 98-0807, p. 3 (La.App.
  • State v. Walker 773 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Henderson 762 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    [5] In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences in the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Coleman 762 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); , the court stated the following regarding downward departures below the statutory minimum sentence, “[a] court may only depart from the minimum sentence if it finds that there is clear and convincing evidence in the particular case before it which would rebut this presumption of constitutionality.” Johnson , 97-1906
  • State v. Debrow 763 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Alford 765 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; -81 (La.
  • State v. Neal 762 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Dank 764 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Webster, 98-0807 (La.App.
  • State v. Hayden 767 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); .
  • State v. Lee 764 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Stone 758 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • Townley v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 762 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In addition, the habitual offender statute has been held to be constitutional “in its entirety.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Gillet 763 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 *730 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Boles 763 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Carter 762 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Burton, 98-0096, pp. 6-7 (La.App.
  • State v. Bazile 762 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Johnson, (La.3/4/98), , the Supreme Court declared that a defendant who distinguished himself as an exception could thereby rebut the presumption that the mandatory sentence is constitutional.
  • State v. Wolfe 761 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Jetton 756 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Monroe 757 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that, in order to depart from a mandatory sentence under the Habitual Offender Law, appellant must be proven by clear and convincing evidence to be "exceptional."
  • State v. Monette 758 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    *368 State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Burton, 98-0096, pp. 6-7 (La.App.
  • State v. Jenkins 759 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Short, 96-2780 (La.App.
  • State v. Bazile 757 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Stevenson 757 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Lane 755 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Norris 754 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Walter Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Ballay 757 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law may still be considered for constitutional excessiveness.
  • State v. Armstrong 756 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .