Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.

796 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Kerry Alexander La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
3/ 4/ 98), State v. Adams, 2007- 0386 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Uganon Sha Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3/4/98), and State v. Short, 96–2780, p. 8 (La.App.
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Paul Glenn La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
3/ 4/ 98), State v. Adams, 07- 0386 La.
State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Lonzette K. Gaddis La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Jared Diaz La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lynn Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3/14/98), ], where we set out guidelines for when and under what circumstances courts should exercise their discretion under [State v.] Dorthey[, ] to declare excessive a minimum sentence mandated by the Habitual Offender Law.
State of Louisiana v. Gerald P. Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Gay La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Anthony Joseph Chaney La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
3/ 4/ 98), - 77, the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences in the Habitual Offender Law.
State of Louisiana v. Travis Boys La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Brian Michael Hughes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3/4/98), the supreme court noted that under Dorthey, there is a presumption that a mandatory sentence is constitutional.
State Of Louisiana v. Tony Johnson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Randy Lee Turner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Boeh La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
3/ 4/ 98), - 77, the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences under the Habitual Offender Law.
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
3/4/98); the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined Dorthey and outlined the criteria a defendant must meet in order to show that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutionally excessive.
State Of Louisiana v. Eric Matherne La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
3/ 4/ 98), ( citation omitted); Flowers, 204 So.
State Of Louisiana v. Cardell Demond Robinson La. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Widner Degruy La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
La. 2020
State v. Dorthey , (La 1998) ; (La.
State Of Louisiana Versus La. 2020
3/4/98), the court of appeal concluded that although relator is an extremely minor offender with regards to his present crime, his life sentence is not constitutionally excessive because he committed numerous predicate felonies.
State of Louisiana v. Frin Wayne Coward La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3/4/98), the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined Dorthey and outlined the criteria a defendant must meet in order to show that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutionally excessive.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Nicholas Brown, Jr. A/K/A Charles Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3/4/98), -77 (second alteration in original), as follows: The Legislature has sole authority under the Louisiana Constitution to define conduct as criminal and provide penalties for such conduct.
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dominic Nabors La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Lynn Tony Clark, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
03/04/98), State v. Lewis, 51,735 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Billy R. Meadows, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
3/4/98), State v. Burks, 47,587(La.
State Of Louisiana v. Lamont Lyles La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
3/ 4/ 98), State v. Dorthey, 623 So.
State Of Louisiana v. Marlon D. Harwell La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Calvin L. Broadway La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
03/04/98), see State v. Roth, 52,359 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Brhian Thomas La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
3/ 4/ 98), - 77, the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences in the Habitual Offender Law.
State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
3/4/98); the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined Dorthey and outlined the criteria a defendant must meet in order to show that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutionally excessive.
State of Louisiana v. Will Antonio Celestine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Brandon R. Laurant La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Lee Elliott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Lee Elliott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Kennon 273 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of mandatory minimum sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
State of Louisiana v. McKartney Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Young 271 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/4/98), , and State v. Dorthey
State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Jinks 267 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Arceneaux 271 So. 3d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Jackson 268 So. 3d 1217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Mathis 268 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/4/98), , 676, the Louisiana Supreme Court re-examined Dorthey and outlined the criteria a defendant must meet in order to show that a mandatory minimum sentence under the Habitual Offender Law is constitutionally excessive.
State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3/4/98), the supreme court recognized the legislature’s “constitutional authority to determine the appropriate penalty for a crime,” but the judiciary’s respective “authority, in the rare case, to declare a sentence within these statutory limits excessive under the facts of a particular case.” Given the “delicate bal
State v. Farry 270 So. 3d 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/4/98), , 676, the supreme court recognized the legislature's "constitutional authority to determine the appropriate penalty for a crime," but the judiciary's respective "authority, in the rare case, to declare a sentence within these statutory limits excessive under the facts of a particular case."
State v. Rathore 262 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Turner 259 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Thompson 259 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
State v. Roth 260 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
3/4/98), , the court held that a downward departure from the mandatory minimum habitual offender sentence may be appropriate, but that it is rare and only warranted under exceptional circumstances.