DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 709 So. 2d 672.

796 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Steve Duane Williams -Aka- Ayaz Sutaria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3/4/98), and State v. Short, 96-2780, p. 8 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 201 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3/4/98), , and State v. Short, 96-2780, p. 8 (La.App.
  • State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3/4/98), (citation omitted); State v. Henderson, 99-1945 (La.App.
  • State v. Eley 203 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3/4/98), -77 , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences in the Habitual Offender Law, While both Dorthey and Johnson involve the mandatory minimum sentences imposed under the Habitual Offender Law, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held
  • State v. Little 200 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Johnson, 1997-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Dixon, 42,594 (La.App.2d Cir.1/16/08), , writ denied, 2008-0711 (La.10/10/08), , cert.
  • State v. Allen 200 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    |14 and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of mandatory sentences in the context of the habitual offender law.
  • State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    ed deference by the judiciary, courts may still deviate below the mandatory minimum sentence when “there is clear and *114 convincing evidence in the particular case before it which would rebut [the] presumption of constitutionality [of the [32sentencing scheme of the statute that forms the basis of sentencing as applied to this particular defendant].” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Isidore 193 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), -77 , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure 'from the mandatory minimum sentences in the Habitual Offender Law, While both Dorthey and Johnson involve the mandatory minimum sentences imposed under the Habitual Offender Law, the Louisiana Supreme Court has hel
  • State v. Ladd 192 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Wilson 189 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Robbins, 43,240 (La.App.2d Cir.6/4/08), 986 So,2d 828, writ denied, 2008-1438 (La.2/20/09), .
  • State v. Eby 248 So. 3d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3/4/98), , 676 ; Dorthey , 623 So.2d at 1278 .
  • State v. Amos 192 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See, State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), (to rebut presumption that mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional, defendant must clearly and convincingly show that he is exceptional, i.e., is victim of legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to culpability of offender, gravity of offense, and circumstances of case).
  • State v. Ellis 190 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.1998), ().
  • State v. Thompson 189 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Thomas, 41,734 (La.App.
  • State v. Small 189 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.03/04/98), .
  • State v. Turner 186 So. 3d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; Smith, supra; State v. Parker, 47,952 (La.App.2d Cir.4/10/13), , writ denied, 13-1051 (La.11/15/13), .
  • State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Robinson, 11-0066, p. 17 (La.App.
  • State v. Fisher 185 So. 3d 842 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/09), ; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.App.2d Cir.10/23/02), , writ denied, 2002-2875 (La.4/4/03), .
  • State v. Miller 185 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , the Louisiana Supreme Court re-examined the issue of when Dor-tkey permits a downward departure from a mandatory minimum sentence in the context of the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Manning 182 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Roland, 49,660 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/15), .
  • State v. Dale 180 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Gay, 34,371 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Toby James Fruge 179 So. 3d 579 La. 2015
  • State v. Smith 181 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), -77 , the Louisiana Supreme Court reexamined the issue of when Dorthey permits a downward departure from the mandatory minimum sentences under the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State v. Sims 173 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 7/2/14), , vacated and remanded on other grounds, 14-1611 (La.3/27/15), [164] So.3d [184], (citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98), , and State v. Short, 96-2780, p. 8 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfred Mayo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7 (La.3/4/98)
  • State v. Mayo 165 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Neely 171 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Smith 166 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Parker, 47,952 (La.App.2d Cir.4/10/13), , writ denied, 13-1051 (La.11/15/13), .
  • State v. Hall 172 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    4 Cir. 7/2/14), , vacated and remanded on other grounds, 14-1611 (La.3/27/15), , (citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98), , and State v. Short, 96-2780, p. 8 (La.App.
  • State v. Graham 171 So. 3d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    The only other sentence available to the defendant under Miller was life imprisonment with parole (barring any deviation from the mandatory minimum sentence, pursuant to State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ).
  • State v. Bias 167 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Cureaux 165 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), -77 .
  • State v. Daigle 167 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , citing State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App.
  • State v. Hartford 162 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Roland 162 So. 3d 558 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Bates, 37,282 (La.App.2d Cir.10/16/03), , writ denied, 2004-0141 (La.5/21/04), .
  • State v. Mosby 155 So. 3d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Pernell 151 So. 3d 940 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    |2We repeat here the specific instructions which we issued to the sentencing judge: *943 We remand this matter to the district court and direct that it conduct a hearing on the defendant’s pending motion to reconsider sentence under the criteria established in [State v.] Sepulvado, [(La.1979),] and [State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98); ].
  • State v. Ross 182 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    - • State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Wise 182 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Taylor , 06-839 at 4, 956 So.2d at 28 (citing State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ); Douglas, 868 So.2d at 900 (citing Johnson, 709 So.2d at 676 ; State v. Harbor, 01-1261 (La.App.
  • State v. Morning 149 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    titutional, the defendant must clearly and convincingly show that “[he] is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), , quoting State v. Young, 94-1636 (La.App.4th Cir.l0/26/95), , writ denied, 95-3010 (La.3/22/96), .
  • State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Second, before imposing sentence under the Habitual Offender Law, the district judge shall conduct a hearing on the defendant’s and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Celestain 146 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 6-7 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Ladd 146 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 3/4/98), , and defendant bears the burden of rebutting that presumption.
  • State v. Byrd 145 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Id.; State v. Hill, 42,025 (La.App.2d Cir.5/9/07), , writ denied, 07-1209 (La.12/14/07), , and State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Price 140 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Burks, 47,587 (La.App.2d Cir.1/16/13), , writ denied, 13-0424 (La.7/31/13), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Daye La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Daye 139 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Lawrence 136 So. 3d 795 La. 2014
    must find clear and convincing *796 evidence that the offender is exceptional, “which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances, this defendant is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
  • State v. Elkins 138 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    arly and convincingly, that he is “exceptional,” meaning that “because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Celestine, 2012-0241 (La.7/2/12), ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Dean 140 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), .