Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 737 So. 2d 41.

251 citing documents.

Dustin Rutledge v. Resource Transportation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/29/99), stated, “Awards of penalties and attorney’s fees in workers’ compensation are essentially penal in nature, being imposed to discourage indifference and undesirable conduct by employers and insurers.” The employer/insurer essentially argues that any nonpayment on its part resulted from conditions over wh
Rutledge v. Resource Transportation 7 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
|sThe supreme court in Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 8 (La.6/29/99), , stated, “Awards of penalties and attorney’s fees in workers’ compensation are essentially penal in nature, being imposed to discourage indifference and undesirable conduct by employers and insurers.” The employer/insurer essentially argues that any nonpayment on its part resulted from conditions over which it ha
Jackson v. M.R. Pittman, LLC 5 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2771, p. 9 (La.6/29/99), .
Zavala v. St. Joe Brick Works 999 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Also see Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
MacFarlane v. SCHNEIDER NAT. BULK CARRIERS 984 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 6/2/04), (citing Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), ).
Honeycutt v. HENRY'S PLUMBING 981 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Steve Honeycutt v. Henry's Plumbing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99)
Fred Ducote v. Louisiana Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
6/29/99), (citing Int’l ).
Ducote v. Louisiana Industries, Inc. 980 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 9 (La.6/29/99), ().
Redler v. Giorlando's Restaurant Corp. 979 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
NOTES [1] Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Hamilton v. Compass Group USA/Morrison 973 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-0110 (La.7/1/97), .
Poole v. GUY HOPKINS CONST. 984 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
[3] Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 5 (La.6/29/99), .
Hayes v. Louisiana State Penitentiary 970 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
[18] Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Rushing v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 965 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271,(La.6/29/99), -46 ( quoting Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), ).
Porter v. Pellerin Construction Co. 958 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Lee v. Heritage Manor of Bossier City 954 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-0110 (La.7/1/97), .
Bertrand v. Dow Chemical Co. 951 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
[3] Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Mia Figgins v. Wal-Mart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Figgins v. Wal-Mart 945 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Larry Dupuy v. Billy L. Wiley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
6/29/99), Nation v. D & J Tire, Inc., 31,345 (La.App.
Dupuy v. Wiley 942 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
See Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Nation v. D & J Tire, Inc., 31,345 (La.
David Mullins v. Concrete & Steel Erectors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99)
Mullins v. Concrete & Steel Erectors 940 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Roussell v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 943 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Thompson v. City of New Orleans 933 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , the Supreme Court also stated that "[a]wards of penalties and attorney's fees in workers' compensation are essentially penal in nature, being imposed to discourage indifference and undesirable conduct by employers and insurers."
Russell v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 933 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 8 (La.6/29/99), .
Young v. Jack in the Box, Inc. 929 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Scott Bennett v. Daigre's Automotive, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99)
Carla Sue Young v. Jack in the Box, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bennett v. Daigre's Automotive, Inc. 930 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Magee v. Abek, Inc. 934 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
[5] Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Ryan v. Blount Bros. Const., Inc. 927 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-0110 (La.7/1/97), .
Adrian Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 926 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The Louisiana Supreme Court has distinguished the two statutes in Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Roberts v. Thibodaux Healthcare Center 934 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
In Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that both penalties and attorney fees were recoverable under La.
Payne v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 929 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 4-5 (La.6/29/99), .
Blanchard v. Rental Service Corp., USA 920 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 8 (La.6/29/99), .
Arias v. Certified Coating, Inc. 924 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, (La.6/29/99), .
Landry v. Furniture Center 920 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Authement, 840 So.2d at 1188 ; Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Dalton Landry v. Furniture Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Eddie Angelle v. Taylor Oilfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
6/29/99), Hutchinson v. Aldworth Co., Inc., 04-24 (La.
Angelle v. Taylor Oilfield 918 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Hutchinson v. Aldworth Co., Inc., 04-24 (La.App.
Burrow v. Delta Container Corp. 923 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
[7] Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), (citations omitted).
Nelson v. Windmill Nursery of Louisiana 923 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Crochet v. Barbera Chevy-Chrysler Co., Inc. 917 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that both penalties and attorney fees were recoverable under La.
Molly Robbins v. Isle of Capri Casino La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Cathy E. Corbello v. Isle of Capri Casino La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Corbello v. Isle of Capri Casino 906 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
“Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” See Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 p. 9 (La.06/29/99), .
Robbins v. Isle of Capri Casino 906 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
“Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” See Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 p. 9 (La.06/29/99), .
Bordelon v. Cox Communications 905 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .