Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 737 So. 2d 41.

251 citing documents.

Freeman v. Triad Builders 902 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Rodrigue v. Lafourche Parish School Bd. 909 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Hornsby v. Bayou Jack Logging 902 So. 2d 361 La. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99)
Jason Halker v. American Sheet Metal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Halker v. American Sheet Metal 898 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99) .
Winford v. Conerly Corp. 897 So. 2d 560 La. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271(La.6/29/99) .
Trahan v. COCO COLA BOTTLING CO. UNITED 894 So. 2d 1096 La. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc. 892 So. 2d 7 La. 2005
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 9 (La.6/29/99), .
Juan Rivera v. M & R Cable Contractors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Rivera v. M & R Cable Contractors, Inc. 896 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Don R. Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets 888 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Richard Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
6/29/99), Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-0110 (La.
Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. 886 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist., 02-439, 02-442, 02-478 (La.1/14/03), ; Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers, 97-0110 (La.7/1/97), .
Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co. 885 So. 2d 562 La. 2004
Merit Constructors, Inc. v. Hickman , 00-0943, p. 5 (La.1/17/01), ; Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc ., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), ; Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son Loggers , 97-0110 at 7, 696 So.2d at 1386 .
Jones v. Gilbert Southern Corp. 881 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Maspnry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 8 (La.6/29/99), .
Howard v. HOLYFIELD CONST., INC. 878 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc. 878 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 8 (La.6/29/99), .
Taylor v. Tommie's Gaming 878 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Montgomery v. Orleans Parish School Board 876 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Distefano v. B & P CONST., INC. 874 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), -46 .
Sarrio v. Stalling Const. Co. 876 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 8 (La.6/29/99), .
Kenneth Perry v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 8 (La.6/29/99), -46.
Perry v. Perry & Sons Vault & Grave Service 872 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 8 (La.6/29/99), -46 .
Floyd Boone, Jr. v. Mid-State Marketing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
6/29/99), Nation v. D & J Tire, Inc., 31,345 (La.App.
Boone v. Mid-State Marketing 867 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
See Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Nation v. D & J Tire, Inc., 31,345 (La.App.
Scott v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 873 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 7 (La.6/29/99), .
Body Masters v. Ray C. Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
6/29/99) (citations omitted).
Fred Edler, Jr. v. City of New Iberia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
6/29/99), Brister, determined that penalties are not available for the discontinuance of benefits.
Masters v. Fontenot 865 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Although the Workers’ Compensation Act is to be liberally construed in regard to benefits, penal statutes are to be strictly construed.” Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), (citations omitted).
Edler v. City of New Iberia 865 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Relying on Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , Brister, , determined that penalties are not available for the discontinuance of benefits.
Hughes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 864 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Sharbono , 97-0110 at 11, 696 So.2d at 1389 (penalties and fees are never assessed automatically against the losing party); Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), at 46 .
Longoria v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 862 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
[2] Williams v. Rush Masonry, *1180 Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), ; Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063 (La.12/1/98), .
Schindler v. ORLEANS REGIONAL SEC. 862 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
See Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Begue v. Crossover, Inc. 868 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 7 (La.6/29/99), .
Wilbert Arnold v. Wal-Mart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
6/29/99), in determining whether Wal-Mart’s conduct in handling his claims warranted the imposition of penalties and attorney’s fees.
Darrell Ranel v. McDonald's La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Arnold v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 858 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
*781 Failure to Employ the Correct Standard in Determining Entitlement to Penalties and to Attorney's Fees; Penalties for Delay in Payment of Benefits Mr. Arnold asserts that the workers' compensation judge erred in employing the "arbitrary and capricious" standard, set forth in Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , in determining whether Wal-Mart's conduct in handling his claims warranted the imposition of penalties and attorney's fees.
Ranel v. McDonald's 858 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Chelette v. Riverwood International USA, Inc. 858 So. 2d 412 La. 2003
The holding in Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , clarified the differences between LSA-R.S.
Authement v. Wal-Mart 857 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that La.
Thomason v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 852 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
See, generally, Williams v. Rush Masonry, 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Canizaro v. Tangipahoa Parish School System 853 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
[3] Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 7 (La.6/29/99), .
Daniels v. Keller Supply, Inc. 854 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
See Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, pp. 8-9 (La.6/29/99), .
Alphonso v. Bridge Terminal Transport 852 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 6 (La.6/29/99), (“[sjince this 1995 amendment, Section 1201.2 now addresses solely the discontinuance of payment of claims, while Section 1201 now addresses solely the timeliness of commencement of benefit payments and timeliness of continued payments.”) J.E.
Edmondson v. PCA International, American Studios 859 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271, p. 9 (La.6/29/99), .
McLin v. Industrial Specialty Contractors 851 So. 2d 1135 La. 2003
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Stelly v. Health South Rehabilitation 854 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Hundley v. Bisso Properties 858 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1 Cir. 11/15/00), , quoting Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), .
Russell v. Snelling Personnel 849 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc., 98-2271 (La.6/29/99), , 45 the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that La.