98-C-3016
Precedential
Processed
Scott v. American Tobacco Co.
Scott v. American Tobacco Co., 731 So. 2d 189 (La. 1999).
Cited by
- Sheffie v. Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC 92 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- Arregui v. Risk Management Services, LLC 62 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Gatlin v. KLEINHEITZ 34 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Lewis v. Jabbar 5 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Monterrey Center, LLC v. Ed.ucation Partners, Inc. 5 So. 3d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- Wade Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Samaha v. Rau 977 So. 2d 880 La. 2008
- Hickman v. CHEVRON USA, INC. 973 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 949 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
- Satterthwaite v. Byais 943 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
- River Birch, Inc. v. ROBIN & ASSOC., INC. 906 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Opinion text
731 So.2d 189 (1999) Gloria SCOTT and Deania M. Jackson, et al. v. The AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, et al. No. 98-C-3016. Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 26, 1999. PER CURIAM. [*] Denied. However, the conclusion of the court of appeal that the reasonable cost of necessary medical monitoring falls within the scope of defendant's liability was purely dicta, unrelated to the class certification issue. We do not consider the correctness of this conclusion, and the trial court should not feel bound by this conclusion when the issue is presented in that court. VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would grant the writ. NOTES [*] Marcus, J., not on panel, recused. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.