DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. American Tobacco Co., 731 So. 2d 189.

21 citing documents.

  • Sheffie v. Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC 92 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    dgment); Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), (holding that “[ajffidavits in support of or in opposition to motions for summary judgment must be filed into evidence at the hearing on the motion or filed into the record in order for the affidavits to be part of the record on appeal.” (Emphasis added)); Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), (holding that information contained in affidavits and depositions submitted as attachments to a memorandum were properl
  • Arregui v. Risk Management Services, LLC 62 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In Aydell v. Sterns, 1998-3135 (La.2/26/99) , the Louisiana Supreme Court granted writ in a matter finding that the Court of Appeal erroneously held that the trial court could not rely on the evidence submitted by the defendant in support of its motion simply because the evidence was attached to the memorandum in support of the motion and not the motion itself.
  • Gatlin v. KLEINHEITZ 34 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), -190 (holding that information contained in affidavits and depositions submitted as attachments to a memorandum were properly before the trial court and appellate court for purposes of a motion for summary judgment).
  • Lewis v. Jabbar 5 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), -90 .
  • Monterrey Center, LLC v. Ed.ucation Partners, Inc. 5 So. 3d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), .
  • Wade Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2/26/99), held that evidence presented as an attachment to the memorandum in support of or in opposition to the motion for summary judgment is properly before the court, reasoning that to hold otherwise “undermines the use of summary judgment procedures to ‘secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every
  • Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    The supreme court in Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135, p. 1 (La.2/26/99), , 190 held that evidence presented as an attachment to the memorandum in support of or in opposition to the motion for summary judgment is properly before the court, reasoning that to hold otherwise "undermines the use of summary judgment procedures to `secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every a
  • Samaha v. Rau 977 So. 2d 880 La. 2008
    See Aydell v. Sterns, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/99), -190 .
  • Hickman v. CHEVRON USA, INC. 973 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 949 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 11/4/98) , , writ denied, 98-3016 (La.2/26/99), .
  • Satterthwaite v. Byais 943 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), -90.
  • River Birch, Inc. v. ROBIN & ASSOC., INC. 906 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    See Scott v. American Tobacco Co., 98-3016 (La.2/26/99), .
  • MANDALAY OIL & GAS v. Energy Develop. Corp. 880 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    13:4231; Scott v. American Tobacco, Co., 98-3016 (La.2/26/99), (per curiam).
  • Boland v. West Feliciana Parish Police Jury 878 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), .
  • Howard Hebert v. Bill-Wood Limited Liability Company, D/B/A Billeaud Planters, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Hebert v. Bill-Wood Ltd. Liability Co. 862 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    To hold otherwise, would, as stated by the supreme court, undermine “the use of summary judgment to ‘secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.’ ” Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135, p. 1 (La.2/26/99), .
  • Davis v. American Home Products Corp. 844 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 11/4/98), , writ denied, 98-3016 (La.2/26/99), , this court distinguished Ford v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., 96-2913 (La.9/9/97), ; on rehearing in part on other grounds, 96-2913 (La.10/10/97), .
  • West v. G & H SEED CO. 832 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    4 Cir.1998); -13 , writ denied, 98-3016 (La.2/26/99); explained that "Ford dealt not only with a combination of substances emitted by different defendants, but combinations that according to plaintiff class' own allegations might involve different combinations for every member of the supposed class as well as effects that would have been different for each member of the
  • O'NEAL v. Blackwell 818 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), .
  • Frisard v. Autin 747 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    See Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), .
  • Melton v. Miley 754 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    We note the supreme court in Aydell v. Sterns, 98-3135 (La.2/26/99), , stated that affidavits submitted by the defendant as attachments to its memorandum in support of its motion for summary judgment were properly before the trial court, even though the affidavits were not attached to the motion and were not entered into evidence at the hearing.