Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Exxon Pipeline v. La Public Service Com'n, 728 So. 2d 855.

13 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Qwandarious Rowe La. 2022
Thomas v. Reg'l Health Sys. of Acadiana, LLC 266 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Woodrow Wilson Constr., LLC v. Amtek of La., Inc. 256 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Neeb Serv., LLC v. Foster 242 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. Guy Hopkins Construction Co. 220 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Robert D. MAYEUX and Lisa M. Mayeux v. George J. CHARLET, Jr., Deceased, Charlet Funeral Home, Inc., Rev. … 203 So. 3d 1030 La. 2016
Brandi Billeaudeau, Veronica Billeaudeau, and Joseph Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority, Dr. Kondilo Skirlis-Zavala, and the Shumacher … 218 So. 3d 513 La. 2016
Foti v. Holliday 27 So. 3d 813 La. 2009
Public Service Comm., 98-1737, 98-1738, p. 8 (La.3/2/99), ("It is undisputed legislative history of an act and contemporaneous circumstances may be helpful guides in ascertaining legislative intent.").
Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 186 La. 2009
Government, 06-2227, pp. 16-17 (La.2/22/07), (Local Government Fair Competition Act; distinction between peremption and prescriptive periods); Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Com'n, 98-1737, p. 14, n. 10 (La.3/2/99), n. 10 (Public Service Commission; citing Hebert for the principle that Legislative purpose is one of the most significant factors in distinguishing peremptive and prescriptive statutes); Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12 (La.10/21/97), (legal malpractice provision; citi
Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
Government, 06-2227, pp. 16-17 (La.2/22/07), (Local Government Fair Competition Act; distinction between peremption and prescriptive periods); Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Com'n, 98-1737, p. 14, n. 10 (La.3/2/99), n. 10 (Public Service Commission; citing Hebert for the principle that Legislative purpose is one of the most significant factors in distinguishing peremptive and prescriptive statutes); Reeder v. North, 97-0239, p. 12 (La.10/21/97), (legal malpractice provision; citi
State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
Comm'n, 98-1737, p. 8 (La.3/2/99), (stating that "[i]n many cases, the legislative history of an act and contemporaneous circumstances may be helpful guides in ascertaining legislative intent").
Sabine Police Jury v. Com'r of Alcohol 898 So. 2d 1244 La. 2005
Public Service Com'n, 98-1737, 98-1738 p. 8 (La.3/2/99), .
State v. Johnson 884 So. 2d 568 La. 2004
Exxon Pipeline Company v. Louisiana Public Service Commission, 98-1737, 98-1738, p. 8 (La.3/2/99), .