Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hardy v. Bowie, 744 So. 2d 606.

293 citing documents.

Domingo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 54 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hardy v. Brown, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.9/8/99), .
Montgomery v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund 51 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Pruitt v. Nale 46 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Lisa Alfano v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Alfano v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government 42 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In this event, the employee has no rightful option but to adhere to the directive.” Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 11 (La.9/8/99), .
Michael Glass v. Lowe's Home Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Johnson v. Littleton 37 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
art. 966; Hardy v. Bowie, 1998-2821 (La.09/08/99), ; Eichelberger v. Sidney, 34,040 (La.App.2d Cir. 11/03/00), .
Manuel v. Regional Transit Authority 36 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.09/08/99), .
Dupre & Son Floor Covering, Inc. v. City of Iota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Dupre & Son Floor Covering, Inc. v. City of Iota 36 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
McManus v. BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY 25 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Crawley v. Coastal Bridge Co. Inc. 24 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 574-7, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
H. B. Rentals, Lc v. Maurice Bledsoe, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
H.B. Rentals, LC v. Bledsoe 24 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Dennis v. Wiley 22 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Roach Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Fairfield Towers, LLC 17 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
D & D Pipe and Rentals, Inc. v. Century Exploration New Orleans,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
D & D Pipe & Rentals, Inc. v. Century Exploration New Orleans, Inc. 10 So. 3d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Scott Hargrave, Et Ux. v. Cecil J. Delaughter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Hargrave v. Delaughter 10 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Lalla v. Calamar, N.V. 5 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[a] fact is ‘material’ when its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiffs cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.” Additionally, the Supreme Court stated that “[fjacts are material if they potentially insure or preclude recovery, affect a
Ralph v. City of New Orleans 4 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.9/8/99), .
Fletcher v. Wendelta, Inc. 999 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
art. 966(C)(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Holloway v. Kansas City S. Ry.
Jean B. Richard, Jr. v. Anna Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Rowell v. Hollywood Casino Shreveport 996 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
art. 966(C)(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Wells v. Red River Parish Police Jury, 39,445 (La.App.2d Cir.3/2/05), , writ not considered, 05-0854 (La.5/13/05) .
Brooks v. TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHEAST LA. 996 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.09/08/99), .
Holland v. Teague 996 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
art. 966(C)(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Holloway v. Kansas City S. Ry.
Beck v. BURGUENO 996 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Jones v. Foster, supra .
White v. CITY OF KENNER EX REL. POLICE DEP. 996 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
The court in Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , [1] discussed the Legislature's actions in adopting the exemption for public entities in the exercise of their duties.
Pugh v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 994 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
[3] See Costello, 864 So.2d at 137-38 ; Babin, 764 So.2d at 39-40 ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), -10 .
Holloway v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 988 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
art. 966(C)(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Wells v. Red River Parish Police Jury, 39,445 (La.App.
Wanda Batiste v. Farm Bureau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Batiste v. Farm Bureau 982 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Gainey v. LA. WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES COM'N 981 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Pugh v. St. Tammany Parish School Board 978 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
9/8/99), -10 , [3] In addition to the argument of their memorandum, the plaintiffs supported their opposition to the motion with the same answers to interrogatories and request for production of documents submitted by the doctor.
Samaha v. Rau 977 So. 2d 880 La. 2008
This court acknowledged the standard of appropriate interpretation in Hardy v. Bowie, 1998-2821 p. 6 (La.9/8/99), .
Scott v. Stokes 976 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Hardy v. Bowie, 1998-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Nicole and Matthew Young v. C. Benny Thibodeaux, O.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Wilson v. Town of Mamou 972 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Woodrow Wilson, Jr. v. Town of Mamou La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
ESSWEIN v. White 968 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Wells v. Red River Parish Police Jury, supra .
Ruben v. Aragon v. Frederick W. Chapman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Aragon v. Chapman 967 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-6 (La.9/8/99), -10 .
Ann Welch v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Cecil 966 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Lowery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 965 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 1998-2821 (La.09/08/99), .
Abbott v. Ryan 964 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "[a] fact is `material' when its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiff's cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery."
Jeff Sepulvado v. Toledo Nursing Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Sepulvado v. Toledo Nursing Center, Inc. 958 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Sitter v. Warner 961 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Wells v. Red River Parish Police Jury, supra.