Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hardy v. Bowie, 744 So. 2d 606.

293 citing documents.

Bates v. Prater 956 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 951 So. 2d 1058 La. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Duncan v. DOW PIPELINE CO. 952 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.3 Cir. 12/26/96), , writ denied, 97-281 (La.3/14/97), .
Mac Duncan v. Dow Pipeline Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
David Duhon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Duhon v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. 952 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Mamie Trahan v. Acadia Parish Sheriff's Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Trahan v. Acadia Parish Sheriff's Office 950 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Louisiana Pigment Company, Lp v. Scott Construction Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Louisiana Pigment Co. v. Scott Const. Co. 945 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Estate of Loveless Ex Rel Loveless v. Gay 945 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
art. 966(C)(2); Racine v. Moon's Towing, 2001-2837 (La.5/14/02), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 1998-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Jones v. Foster 945 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Foley v. Sportran, supra .
Terrance Batiste v. Jose R. Gutierrez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99)
Batiste v. Gutierrez 944 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Rebecca Brown v. State of La., Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Enoch Melton Cole v. State Farm Insurance Companies, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
9/8/99), [, 610] (citing Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Brown v. State 942 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Laney v. City of New Orleans 945 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "[a] fact is `material' when its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiff's cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery."
Vad Daotheuang v. El Paso Production Oil & Gas Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
“The inquiry is whether the plaintiff has any law statutory, jurisprudential, or arising from general principles of fault-to support his claim.” Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 12; (La.9/8/99)
Loyton Courville, Et Ux. v. Ford Motor Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Daotheuang v. El Paso Production Oil & Gas 940 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 12 (La.9/8/99); .
Kline v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANIES 942 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
Agnor v. Caddo Parish School Bd. 936 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
[2] The school board's reliance on Hardy v. Bowie, 1998-2821 (La.9/8/99), , is misplaced.
Helen Vice Palombo and Francis C. Palombo, Sr. v. Frank Bacque, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Palombo v. Bacque 931 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Harper v. Goodwin 930 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Klein v. Cisco-Eagle Inc., 37,398 (La.App.
Nguyen v. Underwriters at Lloyd's 929 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Quyen Nguyen v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 927 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.09/08/99), .
Ceasar v. Hebert 926 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
Irving Ceasar v. Sheriff Sid Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, (La.2/20/04), Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610.
Brown v. Lee 929 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "[a] fact is `material' when its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiff's cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery."
Wallace v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLC 920 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
Jones v. Angelette 921 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; citing Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
Pat Swido and Tommie Swido v. Lafayette Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Swido v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 916 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 12 (La.9/8/99), .
Foster v. City of Shreveport 914 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.09/08/99), ; Demopulos v. Jackson, 33,560 (La.App.
Richardson v. Lawson 913 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[a] fact is ‘material’ when its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiffs cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.” 98-2821, p. 6, 744 So.2d at 610 .
Phelps Dunbar, LLP v. Stout 914 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.09/08/99), .
Pope v. Khalaileh 905 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 574, 03-1533 (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
Lafayette Parish School Board v. Darlene M. Cormier, on Behalf of Her Minor Child, Jade Cormier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610.
Lafayette Parish School Bd. v. Cormier 901 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
Alden v. Lorning 904 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 5 (La.9/08/99), .
Jordan v. Hickman 899 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Thereafter, the court went on to say that the amendment “levels the playing field between the parties in two ways: first, the supporting documentation submitted by the parties should be scrutinized equally, and second, the overriding presumption in favor of trial on the merits is removed.” Id.; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), (citing Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Wells v. Red River Parish Police Jury 895 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Smith v. AAA Travel Agency, 37,728 (La.App.
PG Diners, Inc. v. CAT Scale Co. 886 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
P. G. Diners, Inc. v. Cat Scale Company and Love's Country Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
Lamarque Dodge, Inc. v. Julian Graham Dodge, Inc. 887 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 571*7, 03-1533, (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
Brown v. International Paper Co. 882 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/14/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
Oster v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 881 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
NOTES [1] Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 , quoting Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.