DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hardy v. Bowie, 744 So. 2d 606.

293 citing documents.

  • Underwood v. Best Western Westbank, Inc. 881 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, 03-1533, (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
  • Lane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance Co. 883 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Dykes v. Dykes 877 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    art. 966 C(2); Racine v. Moon’s Towing, 2001-2837 (La.05/14/02), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.09/08/99), .
  • Billy Broussard v. John S. Jester, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Althea Wellman, Tutrix of Jared L. Samuel v. Johnny M. Evans, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Wellman v. Evans 876 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Broussard v. Jester 876 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Johnson v. Culotta 874 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[a] fact is ‘material’ when its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiffs cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.” 98-2821, p. 6, 744 So.2d at 610 .
  • Durmon v. Billings 873 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    art. 966 C(2); Racine v. Moon's Towing, 01-2837 (La.5/14/02), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Smith v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Dept. 874 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 12 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Susan Smith v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Jones v. Estate of Santiago 870 So. 2d 1002 La. 2004
    Hutchinson v. Knights of Columbus, Council No. 5747, [6] 03-1533, (La.2/20/04), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
  • Carter v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 871 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Material Issue of Fact In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “[a] fact is ‘material’ when its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiffs cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.” 98-2821, p. 6, 744 So.2d at 610 .
  • Safford v. Bayou Lafourche Fresh Water District 872 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    See Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 p. 11 (La.9/8/99), ; Mayhom v. McKinney, 34,789 p. 6 (La.App.
  • Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747 866 So. 2d 228 La. 2004
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, pp. 4-5 (La.9/8/99), -610 .
  • Hines v. Garrett 865 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    art. 966 C(2); Racine v. Moon’s Towing, 2001-2837 (La.5/14/02), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Clayton v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 865 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [4] Hardy v. Bowie, 1998-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Smith v. AAA Travel Agency 859 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Ray v. City of Bossier City 859 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.09/08/99), .
  • Kevin H. James v. Red Simpson, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    9/8/99), Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • James v. Red Simpson, Inc. 856 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Klein v. Cisco-Eagle, Inc. 855 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Babin, supra ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Britt v. Taylor 852 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.09/08/99), ; Demopulos v. Jackson, 33,560 (La.App.2d Cir.6/21/00), .
  • UNITED RENTALS HIGH. TECH. v. St. Paul Sur. 852 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • American Zurich Ins. Co. v. Johnson 850 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Gregor v. Argenot Great Cent. Ins. Co. 851 So. 2d 959 La. 2003
    See, e.g., Jackson v. State, Dept. Of Corrections, 00-2882 (La.5/15/01), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Archon v. Union Pacific Railroad, 94-2728 (La.6/30/95), ; Rick v. State, DOTD, 93-1776 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Russell v. Snelling Personnel 849 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.9/8/99), ; Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc ., 93-2512 at p. 27, 639 So.2d at 751 .
  • Hutchison v. Knights of Columbus 847 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    art. 966, see, which must be decided by trial.
  • Reed v. Home Depot USA, Inc. 843 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.
  • Estate of Wilburn v. Leggio 842 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Barnett v. Staats, 25,357 (La.App.2d Cir.1/19/94), .
  • Nicks v. Ax Reinforcement Co. 841 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), (citing Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Sacco v. Allred 845 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 12 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Catfish Cabin of Monroe, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 833 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Babin, supra, citing Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Tasker v. City of New Orleans 834 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), , and the application of the duty-risk analysis, rather than the public duty doctrine, to claims brought against employees of public entities.
  • MOBILE EXPLORATION v. Certain Underwriters 837 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.9/8/99), , Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc ., 93-2512 at p. 27, 639 So.2d at 751 .
  • Williams v. Storms 835 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.9/8/99), , Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc., 639 So.2d at 751 .
  • Adams v. Traina 830 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust Co., 01-2217 (La.04/03/02), ; Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.09/08/99)
  • Arrington v. Law Firm of Aucoin & Courcelle, L.L.C. 832 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Facts are material if they potentially insure or preclude recovery, affect a litigant’s ultimate success,"or determine the outcome of the legal dispute.” Hardy v. Borne, 98-2821, p. 6 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Savoy v. Terrebonne Men's Carnival Club, Inc. 835 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Baker v. Williams 825 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. *567 Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • King v. Bryant 822 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Graves v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 821 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Gregor v. Argenot Great Central Ins. Co. 817 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), .
  • Racine v. Moon's Towing 817 So. 2d 21 La. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Whitaker v. City of Bossier City 813 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    art. 966 C(2); Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.09/08/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.
  • Row v. Pierremont Plaza, LLC 814 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ( citing, Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.
  • McCool v. Beauregard Memorial Hosp. 814 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    See Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99); .
  • Vinccinelli v. Musso 818 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821, p. 12 (La.9/8/99), ; Paul v. Louisiana State Employees Group Ben.
  • Boutin v. Rodrigue 815 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), ; Hayes v. Autin, 96-287 (La.App.
  • Rosen v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    As explained by the Supreme Court in Hardy v. Bowie, 98-2821 (La.9/8/99), : “Under [the discretionary function] doctrine, governmental decisionmakers exercising discretionary functions are immune from suit, because the courts should not chill legislative discretion in policy formation by imposing tort liability for discretionary decision.” Ferdinand F. Stone and Andrew Rinker, Jr., Governme