Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 743 So. 2d 199.

24 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Roberto Lopez La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Lok C. Au La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
9/8/99), –03; State v. Bolden, 21-283 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Gatson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
9/8/99), ”; State v. K.W.T., 2012 La.
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of M.G. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
918199), - 03, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that La.
State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Paul Glenn La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
9/8/99), -04 the first circuit noted: When a defendant seeks to introduce evidence that the victim has made such prior false accusations, the trial judge must evaluate that evidence by determining whether reasonable jurors could find, based on the evid
State v. Cervantes 266 So. 3d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Gros 239 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
9/8/99), , as controlling, arguing that he was not barred from introducing evidence to test the veracity of the alleged victim's testimony and that the defense only had to show that a reasonable trier of fact could find the previous reports false.
State v. Eisert (In re State) 252 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Bryant 110 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Smith, 98-2045 (La.9/8/99), -03 .
State v. Davis 108 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Smith, 98-2045 (La.9/8/99), .
State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
9/8/99), (where the defendant presented evidence sufficient to allow reasonable jurors to conclude that the victim made false allegations of sexual molestation in the past, that evidence directly addressed the victim’s credibility and could have been admitted once the trial court made a determination that the evidence met
State v. Dixon 982 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Defendant argues on appeal that under State v. Smith, 98-2045, pp. 5-6 (La.9/8/99), , the rape shield statute is inapplicable to evidence of prior false accusations of sexual misconduct offered for impeachment purposes.
State v. Freeman 970 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
art. 607 C. State v. Smith, 98-2045 (La.9/8/99), .
State v. Zeringue 862 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Smith, 98-2045, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), ; State v. Wallace, 00-1745 (La.App.
State v. Bolden 852 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Smith, 98-2045, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), ; La.
State v. Kirsch 836 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Smith, 98-2045, pp. 3-5 (La.9/8/99), -203 .
State v. Richard 812 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Smith, 98-2045, pp. 3-5 (La.9/8/99), -203 .
State v. Gaal 800 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
art. 607C; State v. Smith, 98-2045 (La.9/8/99), .
State v. Joseph 802 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
art. 607(C); State v. Smith, 98-2045, p. 3 (La.9/8/99), .
State v. Wallace 788 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Smith, 98-2045, p. 5 (La.9/8/99), ; La.
State v. Judge 758 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
The supreme court recently addressed this issue in State v. Smith, 98-2045 (La.9/8/99); .
State v. Frith 747 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
art. 412 F. Recently, the Supreme Court held that “Article 412 is inapplicable in sexual assault cases where defendant seeks to question witnesses regarding the victim’s prior false allegations concerning sexual behavior for impeachment purposes.” State v. Smith, 98-2045 (La.9/8/99), (emphasis added).