Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Howard, 751 So. 2d 783.

140 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Howard, 98-64 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. McCarthy 112 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Bordes, 98-0086, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 11/30/11) , -67 , writ denied, 2012-0374 (La.5/25/12), , as follows: “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post-conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Jones 99 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Cavazos 94 So. 3d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
State v. Howard, 98-0064, pp. 7-10 (La.4/23/99), -797 ; Robertson, 630 So.2d at 1281 .
State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post-conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Green 84 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post-conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. M.C. 60 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See, e.g., State v. Snyder, 98-1078, p. 22 (La.4/14/99), ; State v. Howard, 98-64, pp. 3-4 (La.4/23/99), -792 .
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
1266 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003); State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Preston 40 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Howard, 98-0064, pp. 18-19 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Wiltz 28 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Thus, “a reviewing court may impinge on the fact finder’s discretion only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.” Id., quoting State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 14 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Edwards 17 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Leger, supra; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Norris A. Palms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Howard, 1998-0064 p. 15 (La.4/23/99), cert.
State v. Major 1 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
1266 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003) [34] ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; [35] State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Bradley 995 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), (citations omitted).
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
ly pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, 06-0518, (La.11/2/07), (conviction reversed and death sentence vacated by this Court on a Batson violation; remanded for new trial); State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), ; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), ; (La.1984
State v. Smith 989 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
283 , 151 L.Ed.2d 208 (2001), to allow the trial court to conduct, if warranted, a full evidentiary hearing, State v. Howard, XXXX-XXXX, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
State v. Howard, XXXX-XXXX p. 7-10 (La.4/23/99), -97 , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Terrance Cotrell Robinson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Howard, 1998-0064 p. 15 (La.4/23/99), cert.
State v. Robinson 981 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Howard, XXXX-XXXX p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Montgomery 974 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
2d Cir.1993); State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Thomas Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Howard, 1998-0064[,] p. 15 (La.4/23/99), cert.
State v. Smith 969 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Howard, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
See State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Galindo 968 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Harris 966 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Leger, supra; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Brian Maness La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Howard, 1998-0064 p. 15 (La.4/23/99), cert.
State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
See State v. Howard, 98-0064, pp. 31-21 (La.4/23/99), -17 (opening statement in penalty phase of capital murder trial, that referred to defendant as a "thing" that deserved the death penalty, was not reversible error under either harmless-error standard or review of errors affecting fundamental fairness of the proceedings and reliability of sentencing verdict, even t
State of Louisiana v. Dennis Wayne Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Howard, 1998-0064 p. 15 (La.4/23/99), cert.
State v. Baker 956 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Howard, XXXX-XXXX p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
See State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.2/23/99), (defendant and several others savagely beat and stabbed 82-year-old female victim in her home); State v. Robertson, supra, (defendant savagely stabbed an elderly couple to death during robbery in their home; victims were 76 and 71); State v. Tart, 92-0772 (La.2/9/96), (defendant bou
State v. Harrison 957 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Howard, 98-64 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Falcon 956 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 18 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Nathan Stringer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The footnote to this passage elaborates: See also: State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), where it was held that when the state's case turns upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, the trial judge should instruct the jury to treat such testimony with great caution.
State v. Stringer 949 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
The footnote to this passage elaborates: See also: State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , where it was held that when the state's case turns upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, the trial judge should instruct the jury to treat such testimony with great caution.
State v. Jackson 947 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
[11] See State v. Howard, XXXX-XXXX, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Bordes, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
State v. Howard, XXXX-XXXX p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Reichard 935 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
State v. Clark 924 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Howard, 98-0064, pp. 27-28 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
ST. MARTINVILLE v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 917 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Id.; see also State v. Howard, 98-0064, pp. 27-28 (La.4/23/99), -13 .
State v. Higgins 898 So. 2d 1219 La. 2005
State v. Howard, 98-0064, pp. 7-9 (La.4/23/99), -95 ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, pp. 2-3 (La.1/14/94), -81 .
State v. Motley 895 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
See State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.04/23/99), , cert.
State v. Swain 900 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Howard, 98-64 (La.4/23/99), -792 , cert.
State v. Cole 900 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
641-649.1; State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 3 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
State v. Bertrand 891 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .