DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Howard, 751 So. 2d 783.

140 citing documents.

  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    See State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
    1983); State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Roy, 95-0638 (La.10/4/96), ; State v. Gradley, 97-0641 (La.5/19/98), ; and State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), .
  • State v. Evans 864 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 14 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Boatner 861 So. 2d 149 La. 2003
    Deruise , 98-0541 at 26, 802 So.2d at 1243 ; State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 14 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    Duncan at p. 38 , 802 So.2d at 559; Deal at 17 , 802 So.2d at 1268; State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 36 (La.4/23/99), ; State v. Letulier, 97-1360, p. 27 (La.7/8/98), ; State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 31 (La.9/8/99), ; State v. Ortiz, 96-1609, p. 23 (La.10/21/97), ; State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 19 (La.7/1/97), ; State v. Davis, 92-1623, pp. 34-35 (La.
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
    Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 40 (La.5/14/02), ___ So.2d ___, ___; State v. Deal, 00-0434, p. 17 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 38 (La.10/16/01), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 36 (La.4/23/99), ; Letulier , 97-1360 at p. 27, 750 So.2d at 800 ; State v. Thibodeaux, 98-1673, p. 31 (La.9/8/99), ; State v. Ortiz, 96-1609, p. 23 (La.10/21/97), ; Connolly, 96-1680 at p. 19, 700 So.2d at 823; State v. Davis, 92-1623, p. 35 (La.5/23/94), .
  • State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
    [2] see also State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 14 (La.4/23/99), .
  • State v. Orange 845 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, pp. 3-4 (La.4/23/99), -792 , cert.
  • State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Woods 830 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
  • State v. Sanborn 831 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    In support of his decision, the trial judge cited State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Moore 827 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    In State v. Howard, 98-64, pp. 3-4 (La.4/23/99); -792 , cert.
  • State v. Sullivan 817 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), -792 , *338 cert.
  • State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), .
  • State v. Harris 815 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. *407 15 (La.4/23/99), .
  • State v. Zeno 811 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    The footnote to this | mpassage elaborates: See also: State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , where it was held that when the state’s case turns upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, the trial judge should instruct the jury to treat such testimony with great caution.
  • State v. Scott 823 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    2d Cir.1993); State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), .
  • State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
    757 , 139 L.Ed.2d 702 (1998); State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , I write separately to point out that it is preferable to educate capital jurors on the full range of their sentencing options.
  • State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 2/14/01) , -649 , this Court considered a similar argument and set out the following standard: “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Bunley 805 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Chattman 800 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Addison 788 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [4] See also: State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , (La.
  • State v. Jason 787 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
    See State v. Howard, 98-0064 p. 14 (La.4/23/99), .
  • State v. Robichaux 788 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    As to the defendant’s argument that his counsel was ineffective, “[a]s a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Briscoe 779 So. 2d 30 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Johnson 775 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 26 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Reese 774 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99)
  • State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    The same issue was also raised in State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99); , cert.
  • State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, P. 14 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396 La. 2000
    [14] In State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , this court allowed the denial of a challenge to a juror who would be more inclined to vote for death than for life, but would consider both and would follow the judge's instructions.
  • State v. Marshall 774 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Griffin 756 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard, 98-0064, p. 15 (La.4/23/99); , cert.
  • State v. Young 757 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    In State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99), , cert.
  • State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    App. 4 Cir. 3/15/94), ); see also State v. Howard, 98-0064 p. 16 (La.4/23/99), (no "plain error" rule regarding jury instructions; there must be a contemporaneous objection).
  • State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999