Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bright, 776 So. 2d 1134.

159 citing documents.

State v. Fontenot 207 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4/11/00), , reversed on other grounds, 02-2793 (La.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS READO NARGO A/K/A RENALDO NARGO La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
4/11/00), reversed on other grounds, 02-2793 (La.
State v. Nargo 193 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Bright, 98-398, pp. 40-41 (La.4/11/00), , reversed on other grounds, 02-2793 (La.5/25/04), .
State v. Bonilla 186 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
at 620-21 (citing State v. Bright, 98-0398 (La.4/11/00), ).
State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4/11/00), (alterations in original).
State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Bright, 98-398, pp. 39-40 (La.4/11/00), (alterations in original).
State of Louisiana v. Jaymes Larmar Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Harris 157 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also State v. Bright, 98-398 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Alexis 157 So. 3d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Bright, 1998-0398 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Gillum 165 So. 3d 924 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), , citing State v. Hampton, 98-0331, p. 13 (La.4/23/99), .
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Wayne Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/11/00), writ granted, 03-2796 (a. 1/30/04), reversed on other grounds, 02-2793, 03-2796 (La.
State v. Carmouche 145 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Bright, 98-398 (La.4/11/00), , writ granted, 03-2796 (La.1/30/04), , reversed on other grounds, 02-2793, 03-2796 (La.5/25/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Alcide Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
4/11/00), reversed on other grounds, 02-2793 (La.
State v. Hypolite 139 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Bright, 98-398, pp. 40-41 (La.4/11/00), , reversed on other grounds, 02-2793 (La.5/25/04), .
State v. Warner 137 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
art. 851(3); State v. Brisban, 2000-3437, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. |16 Bright, 98-0398, pp. 25-26 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Jose Luis Segura, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Bright, 1998-0398 (La.4/11/00); .
State of Louisiana v. Eric John Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00)
State v. Anderson 116 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Freddie Lynn Lassien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Bright, 98-398 (La.4/11/00)
State of Louisiana v. Brent Authorlee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Bright, 98–398, pp. 17–18 (La.4/11/00), post-conviction relief granted, 02–2793, 03–2796 (La.
State v. Authorlee 111 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Bright, 98-398, pp. 17-18 (La.4/11/00), , post-conviction relief granted, 02-2793, 03-2796 (La.5/25/04), .
State v. Taylor 104 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bright, 98-0398,[sic] (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Brent Ervin Prudhomme La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Prudhomme 101 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bright, 98-398 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan L.citizen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/11/00), post- conviction relief granted, 02-2793, 03-2796 (La.
State v. Shannon 101 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Terrance L. Sinegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/11/00), 1, wherein the court discussed the issue of identity as follows: When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden of proof beyond a r
State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In support of his assertion, Defendant refers to State v. Bright, 98-398, p. 22-23 (La.4/11/00), , 1147 1 wherein the court discussed the issue of identity as follows: When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidenti-fieation in order to carry its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Smith 96 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 851(3); State v. Brisban, 2000-3437, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Bright, 98-0398, pp. 25-26 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Bright, 1998-0398 (La.4/11/00)
State ex rel. A.H. 80 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 6/29/11), , citing State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), .
State ex rel. C.D. 69 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
“When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the state is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Bright, 1998-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00)
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Demond Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00)
State of Louisiana v. Fred Ballard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
4/11/00), the defendant challenged his identification as the perpetrator and argued the identification should have been suppressed.
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jude Gilbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
4/11/00), (citation omitted).
State v. Gilbert 41 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
For example, where the defendant, armed with a gun and standing a short distance from the victim, shot the victim three times in the back, the supreme court held that the “jurors were certainly justified in finding that the defendant had possessed the requisite specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm.” State v. Bright, 98-398, p. 10 (La.4/11/00), (citation omitted).
State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00)
State v. Wilson 68 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Bright, 1998-0398 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Johnson 33 So. 3d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 804(A)(1); State v. Bright, 98-0398 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
4/11/00), :1 When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Stipe 30 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
4/11/00), , 1147: [1] When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
State of Louisiana v. Carl Anthony Gobert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00)
State v. Gobert 24 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Perry 9 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Blight, 1998-0398 (La.4/11/00); .
State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Bright, 98-0398 (La.4/11/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Narcisse La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Adams 993 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008